this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2026
410 points (96.2% liked)

Technology

89506 readers
3174 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from : https://lemmy.zip/post/71321898

Netzpoltik details that police are able to gain access in this way either through physical access to someone’s phone or by intercepting verification codes via a state-sanctioned phishing attack or intercepting SMS messages via telephone surveillance

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

you know what would solve this? simplex.

[–] yestalgia@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Just get everyone in your life to move to ______ and that will solve all your problems"

A suggestion as old as time

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

it's one of the most secure message apps available.

messages are signed, encrypted and passed through servers, never left on the server. unless you were the intended recipient you will not decrypt it.

it's the truecrypt of instant messaging.

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

signal has a closed source server that can't be audited.

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

what does it need a database for?

simplex is literally a message broker. no data remains on the server.

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Signal doesn't keep messages either. Do you know what they can serve FBI every time they ask? Nothing but number at first seen date. They don't have your metadata.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

then why does it have a database?

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Here's what he documentation says;

Messages persist in memory or in a database until they cross a threshold of time, typically on the order of days.

... Or wait...

Oops, that was from Simplex, who has a database, that didn't come from Signal's documentation

https://github.com/simplex-chat/simplexmq/blob/master/protocol/overview-tjr.md

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

cherry picking.

By default, routers do not retain access logs, and permanently delete messages and queues when requested. Messages persist in memory or in a database until they cross a threshold of time, typically on the order of days.[0] There is still a risk that a router maliciously records all queues and messages (even though encrypted) sent via the same transport connection to gain a partial knowledge of the user's communications graph and other meta-data.

what this means is don't blindly trust a random public router.

if you host your own router, you can set the threshold to hours or seconds. you can also ensure that your router isn't maliciously storing records.

simplex uses an in-memory queue to store messages for delivery. if the server was extracted for legal measures, this means the messages are erased and difficult if not impossible to collect.

for signal, they are written to disk. this means there is evidence of communications between users. even if you host your own signal server, it will be there.

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Liar

You're claiming Signal does these things when it doesn't, and claim Simplex doesn't do what's in the documentation

By the way, the Simplex CEO supports nazis

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Because sometimes, people are not online 24/7 and messages still need to reach them when possible.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh really? Simplex would block someone from accessing your phone and thus Simplex' data?

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

give me a list of messaging apps that stop attacks that leverage physical access.

use a better os that has encryption and kill codes if that's your concern.

[–] vald@mbin.linuxnation.social 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

give me a list of messaging apps that stop attacks that leverage physical access.

you know what would solve this? simplex.

um...

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

either through physical access to someone’s phone OR by intercepting verification codes via a state-sanctioned phishing attack OR intercepting SMS messages via telephone surveillance

why are you so against people using a more secure way to communicate?

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

the only time they mention signal is when they explain they used linked devices to obtain signal messages. not SMS! if you lose your phone or whatever, and log in on a new device, your messages won't magically reappear, they are lost, and all your contacts get a warning that your safety numbers have changed.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

simplex messages stay on your phone. you can't switch phones and have them follow you because there's no way to sign in because there's no account for you to sign in with.

simplex doesn't require a phone number or email. the trust is made between users, keeping users safer because it requires physical access between users. sure you can share your code over SMS or otherwise, but that's a user issue that breaks usage policy, not a problem with the software.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

simplex messages stay on your phone

I think that's what I said with signal too. the exception is you can have your messages follow you, if you still have the old phone, because the app supports transferring the data.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

if it can transfer the data, there's more opportunity to successfully steal it.

convenience will always negate security.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I have bad news for you, simplex also has this "security flaw": https://simplex.chat/docs/guide/managing-data.html

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

cool.

so then signal is just as good as simplex.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Intercepting a verification code with signal does not allow reading messages.