this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2026
120 points (98.4% liked)

Privacy

50976 readers
944 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Never seen one to address the amount of externals they send your data to. Could be a EU thing?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yxc999@lemmy.ml 47 points 2 days ago (3 children)

"We value your privacy" above 1032 partners and no disagree button is unhinged

[–] francois@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"We value your privacy" is the most common lie on the internet in the last decade

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It isn't a lie, they value your privacy a lot, they make money selling it to third parties.

Longer the text of the PP, less privacy in the service, always. Services with real privacy don't need a long PP with a lot of legal jerga, they have nothing to hide. Best to scan the service with Webbkoll or Blacklight, Or Exodus (Android), there you see what they do with your data.

[–] dgriffith@aussie.zone 25 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

"We value your privacy"

They value it alright. Like how an oil company can "value" an oilfield - so much untapped resources, just sitting there waiting to be exploited.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Isn't there supposed to be a one click disagree to all button, legally? Or did I misunderstand that law?

[–] bertlewirth@lemy.lol 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'd like to think that there's a disagree button in the "more" button, but I'm not holding my breath. As an aside, I've seen some (Guardian, for example) that let you disagree IF you subscribe for money. Pretty sure that's gotta be illegal.

[–] tae_glas@slrpnk.net 7 points 2 days ago

usually, that format involves toggling off every single one of their third party partners, and then a separate toggle is further down for each one's "legitimate use" or something.

they're clearly hoping that by making it incredibly time-consuming to go through every option, that most people would give in and accept all.

i don't think that's supposed to be allowed under GDPR, but making complaints is also time-consuming. i'd rather just leave those sites immediately after seeing there's no "reject all" and make a mental note that their stinky site is unusable 🤷

[–] artyom@piefed.social 4 points 2 days ago

I think it's regional. Often you'll see "necessary only" which, who knows what they consider "necessary". If you have a adblocker, there's typically a list for "cookie annoyances" you need to enable for some reason. If that doesn't work you can always use the element picker, although that sometimes breaks the site. If that happens I just leave.