this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2026
194 points (90.8% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

70631 readers
753 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

We heartily recommend visiting the free port of freemediaheckyeah (aka FMHY) while you sail the high seas, for all the freshest links the ocean has to offer.

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 14 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (6 children)

...Why tho? Are people worried about legitimately useful models getting banned? Because this feels to me like an attempt to preserve models that do explicitly unethical things.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Unethical uses are legitimate.

It's your computer. It should do what it's told.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 26 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's because Nvidia bought huggingface, and everyone expects them to start deleting anything unprofitable, not just potentially objectionable.

anything unprofitable, not just potentially objectionable.

Those are the same thing to them...

[–] blartcap_@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 5 days ago

If "unethical" means "things Nvidia doesn't want you to do", then yes.

[–] tomatolung@sopuli.xyz 4 points 5 days ago

the trend is currently that oen weight models are going proprietary as they are trying to find methods of making money, so capturing what exists of them might make the last one before they go closed still feasible to retrieve.

[–] MysticMushroom1776@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

unethical things

You mean like anything that goes against pro-corprate neoliberal values? It should be. We should fight to preserve models like that the same way we fight to have spaces to stay that stuff ourselves.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net -2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

No I mean like suicide encouragement and child porn.

I acknowledge that people misusing LLMs is an issue but I'm not going to be okay with using "think of the children" the same lame excuse lawmakers are trying to use to destroy freedom online to excuse giving corporations the power to decide that we can't say anything that goes against their corporate values on Chatbots running on our computers. They absolutely abuse that agency when they are given it. Some take it as far as saying you can't swear.

Right now it's a choice between that and using unfiltered models while using your own rational judgement.

[–] Womble@piefed.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Those go against pro-corporate values (at least the ones that they outwardly want to show). Currently your only choice are let the corporations pick what is acceptable for you, or have an anything goes model and take responsibility for yourself.

Their values also include:

  • Respecting Intelectual Propery
  • Not punching fascists (liberal harm reduction)
  • Cops are good
  • "There is no proof charlie Kirk is dead"

And other really slimy things that they will absolutely put into filters designed to be not removable by the user. If this is what ethics means these days, it's probably better to be unethical.

[–] Zeniv@lemmy.quasarke.net 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Because both major GPU manufacturers are controlled by the same family. The primary model repo is controlled by that same family now. Both major pipelines are controlled by that same family. ONNX and the diffusion pipelines are maintained by Microsoft. The alternatives are controlled by hyperscalers (with the exception of civitai I guess). All frontier model pipelines are directly controlled by a single family in China. So its very much possible that you could be banned from accessing them yes. We really don't need a pirate instance we just need AN instance at this point.

[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 days ago

TIL that the CEOs of AMD and Nvidia are first cousins once removed.

You don't even need an account to grab from HF. And ironically, the only people who sometimes need mirrors are Chinese users.