this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2026
666 points (98.1% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

3909 readers
61 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, anti-communism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc. This includes instance shaming.

Introduction to Socialism (external links)

Wiki

Marxism-Leninism Study Guide: Basic Course

Marxism-Leninism Study Guide: Advanced Course

Audiobooks Read by Dessalines

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (6 children)

I guess, but TbF many places have slipped into unadulterated fascism. Markets are highly manipulated. Just as communists complain that all failed communism wasn't really communism, a capitalist could rightly complain this isn't really capitalism.

[–] zaubentrucker@sopuli.xyz 30 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Fascism and Capitalism are not opposed. Much rather, fascism is born from capitalist countries, where the owning class controls the media and the government.

Manipulation of markets is also not contradictory to capitalism. The markets are manipulated by capitalists after all.

Finally, the past has proven, that capitalism doesn't need fascism to create crises.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works -5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

This is circular. Communist ideals have also degraded to militant authoritative states. I'm not beating a Pro-capitalist drum, but this concept that theres a clearly superior ideology is so reductionist and boring.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago

Socialist states have indeed resulted in militant defense of their socialist projects. This is a necessary consequence of living in a world driven by imperialism.

[–] cobalt32@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I believe you are thinking of Marxist-Leninist ideals. They call themselves communist, but they believe that they can bring about a stateless society (communism) by seizing state power, which is deranged. You cannot achieve a goal through actions that are opposed to said goal.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago

You aren't fighting against Marxist-Leninists, but Marxists, period. The Marxist conception of the withering of the state stems from the Marxist understanding that the base of the state is class struggle, so when you abolish class by collectivizing all production and distribution, you abolish the base of the state, which then gradually withers. It does not mean all administration is abolished, but that the aspects of society meant to certify one class stays at the top no longer need to function and thus become useless institutions over time, fading away like horse-carriages today.

[–] zaubentrucker@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 month ago

Did you mean to reply to the other person? I didn't say anything about another ideology

[–] mlatu@moist.catsweat.com 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

the thing is, i can tell you what real communism is: internationalism, where nobody is other-ed by another person. nobody is exploited for another person to relish in their accomplishments. imagine strangers as distant cousins, long lost siblings even and meet them with a real smile.

what, on the other hand is real capitalism? how would the world look like if we skipped past turbo and got hypercapitalism?

i yearn for the first thing, i don't want to imagine what real capitalism might look like.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

i don't want to imagine what real capitalism might look like.

No need to imagine, we're in it.

[–] mlatu@moist.catsweat.com 1 points 4 weeks ago

not quite there yet, it could be worse

:P

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

a capitalist could rightly complain this isn't really capitalism.

Fascism and capitalism aren't mutually exclusive. In fact, they go together hand-in-glove

So no, nobody could rightfully argue that.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

a capitalist could rightly complain this isn’t really capitalism.

Capitalism works! It's just never been tried!

[–] foggianism@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Capitalism works! We just need to make sure to crush any country that tries socialism so people don't see that there is a better alternative.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago

Existing socialism is not "failed communism." There are two subsets of the people that say existing socialism is not "real communism:"

  1. The people incorrectly believing that existing and historically existing socialist states are not truly socialist, usually due to some arbitrary degree of "purity" they failed

  2. People correctly stating that socialism and communism are two distinct stages, and that all existing socialism has not yet reached communism.

Socialism as it actually exists in real life has historically been enormously uplifted to the working classes. It has worked every single time it has been established.

[–] cobalt32@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That might be true if words had no meaning, but fortunately for us, they do! A communist society is a society that is moneyless, classless, and stateless. Given that most so-called "communist" revolutions ended up seizing state power instead of abolishing it, it's no wonder why they all failed to achieve communism.

On the flip side, capitalism is an economic system where the means of production are privately owned. There is disagreement on whether fascism constitutes it's own economic system, but the fact remains that it has historically emerged from capitalist states in crisis.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago

The siezure of state power and establishing a worker state is the fundamental pre-requisite for collectivizing all production and distribution. The abolition of class and money comes along with the collectivization of production and distribution, at which point there is no longer class struggle and thus no basis for a state. This is basic Marxism, the socialist states have not "failed" to do this, but rather have not yet developed to this level.

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

This applies only if you don't understand communism