this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2026
922 points (99.7% liked)

World News

58190 readers
1237 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world

Ask Historians !askhistorians@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] x00z@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Where I live, gambling requires or has the following:

  • 21+
  • Casinos and online sites need to verify your identity trough your actual passport
  • No advertising allowed
  • Government supplied blacklists for problematic gamblers
  • Daily/Weekly limits
  • Very strict rules about what is allowed to be gambled on
  • Notices about getting help for gambling addiction everywhere
  • No weird fake coins. You see your actual money and gamble with your actual money.
  • All win rates should be publicly posted and verified 'fair' by the government
  • ... etc
[–] ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago

Still a cancer

[–] Joelk111@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I thought that's how it worked where I have the misfortune of residing, in America, but apparently the people in charge are more worried about renaming bodies of water.

I see massive billboards on the highway advertising the casino we have nearby with straight up false claims like "the next win is just around the corner" or something and always wonder how they got away without a "TOBACCO IS CANCEROUS SMOKE AT YOUR OWN RISK" type label on their ads. It makes me so angry to see casinos literally promising wins when that isn't how casinos fucking work and everybody with two braincells to rub together knows that.

[–] captcha@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 points 2 hours ago

"the next win is just around the corner"

They should depict a person walking around a round building

[–] baeb66@lemmy.today 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The smartest policy I have seen for gambling was in Singapore. I think it's S$150 per entry into the casino (or S$3000 annually) for Singaporeans to gamble. Foreign tourists don't pay this levy. It keeps the locals out who don't have the disposable income to gamble while bringing in money from foreigners.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Ah yes the class separation - the usual approach to every problem in Singapore

[–] nummy@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I've seen more people from lower income trying out gambling to get out of poverty (or in hopes to have something to eat for the week). So it kinda makes sense in this situation, maybe?

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Probably but it also restricts opportunities for lower class people like let's say you're building a business contact and want to take them to a casino. Now obviously you're being restricted just because of your current economic position. If anything lower classes should have fewer restrictions not more.

I don't think we need to babysit "the poor" but instead support people with social nets and provide opportunities for growth. The Singapore style of governing is oppression disguised as progress.

I guess this one makes sense though, if you don't have the money to pay the entry fee, you should not be gambling anything at all.

[–] Joelk111@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Taxes on addictions always disproportionately affect the poor. I suppose addictions and most other societal issues also disproportionately affect the poor.

[–] protogen420@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 15 hours ago

and can cause dependency on a state level on a problematic sector which can further entrech legal status