this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2026
44 points (100.0% liked)
GenZedong
5299 readers
42 users here now
This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.
See this GitHub page for a collection of sources about socialism, imperialism, and other relevant topics.
This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.
We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.
Rules:
- No bigotry, anti-communism, pro-imperialism or ultra-leftism (anti-AES)
- We support indigenous liberation as the primary contradiction in settler colonies like the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Israel
- If you post an archived link (excluding archive.org), include the URL of the original article as well
- Unless it's an obvious shitpost, include relevant sources
- For articles behind paywalls, try to include the text in the post
- Mark all posts containing NSFW images as NSFW (including things like Nazi imagery)
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I suspect this confusion may be just an artifact of the specific words chosen for the English translation.
As far as i can tell in the German original text Marx uses the terms "use value" and "use item" somewhat interchangeably, at least in this section. But clearly, if you read further the entire section, which is about the distinction between the use and exchange value of an item, you see that what he means is that use value is a property of an item.
Feel free to run the original German text through a few different translators to get a feel of what some alternative wordings might be:
Your first quoted passage
Second quoted passage
(I copied a little more than your short quoted passages so you can see the full context.)
I think the following part illustrates this interchangeable use of the terms "use value" (in German "Gebrauchswert") and "use item" ("Gebrauchsgut"):
(My addition in the square brackets is just to clarify that Marx here, i.m.o., is using a typical German syntax where a compound word can be abbreviated when its first part was already used in the previous compound word.)
Translated:
I think this is some unfortunately imprecise use of language, but that is how Marx wrote it.
Thanks for the detailed answer