this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2026
37 points (93.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

16839 readers
1175 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The point is that horses got replaced by trains, trams and bicycles for most people long before cars became widely used.

[–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Horses were still used for many things still when those existed. They were fully replaced by the ICE

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You are also arguing in bad faith, because cars are not the same as internal combustion engines. You might be able to argue correctly that tractors replaced farm animals for productive use, but tractors are not cars.

[–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Tractors are a variety of car. I'm not arguing in bad faith I just think that's nonsense.

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And boats are a variety of car if they have an ICE, right? 🤡

[–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

boats are not a variety of car, but also boats didn't replace horses? tractors are in no way meaningfully different from a car.

both four wheeled vehicles attached to an ICE. Cars.

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You are making up arbitrary definitions to suit your silly argument. A boat is a form of personalized transport with an ICE engine, a steering wheel and seats, even a windshield etc. so it is clearly a "car" 🤡

[–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

A car, or an automobile, is a motor vehicle with wheels. Most definitions of cars state that they run primarily on roads, seat 1–8 people, have four wheels, and mainly transport people rather than cargo.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Car

you're calling me a clown when you don't even know what a car is?? 🤡

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

By that definition a tractor isn't a car.

You’re calling me a clown when you don’t even know what a car is?? 🤡

[–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The only thing there that it doesn't fit is "primarily on roads" the weakest part of the definition because there are plenty of off-road cars.

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Where do tractors mainly transport people (or cargo)?

A boat is clearly closer to your definition of a car than a tractor.

[–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

People ride in the tractor, the hitch has cargo but saying a car with a hitch isn't a car is absurd.

You saying a boat is closer because of this nonsense point is insane. Also a truck is a car, but can primarily move cargo.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

A motor vehicle with wheels doesn't describe a tractor? 🤔

[–] lovely_reader@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Have you read the article? It's really not about horses at all, and it makes some good points that help put the horse comment into context.

[–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Yes there are good points but the initial premise that it's a myth is wrong, I did read the article.

[–] lovely_reader@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Perhaps we're getting hung up on the semantics of "replaced." Where once there were horses, there were later internal combustion vehicles of many kinds. But the point the article makes is simply that that "replacement" wasn't as direct as the typical claim, as urban workers were not commuting on horseback. People did not ride into the dealership in a personal carriage, trade in the horses, and drive off the lot in a Model T. At that time, communities were denser and people were walking and using transit. Some of the transit was pulled by horses, later replaced by individual cars as the auto industry systematically attacked transit and reshaped cities, but that's not what the "replaced" claim implies. It has the sound of a 1:1 swap.