this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2026
29 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

51573 readers
441 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I can't get the fingerprinting protection to work correctly on IronFox, but my combination of extensions works fine with Fennec and LibreWolf on desktop. I tried playing with the fingerprinting presets and disabling webGL, but none of that has worked.

I really don't want to use Fennec since it seems to have all the Mozilla bloat. It won't even erase history on close, only when clicking "Quit" from the selection menu, which I think is a fucking terrible design decision.

I'm using this site to see if a random hash is generated on each reload: https://royfish.dev/fingerprints-are-the-new-cookies

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sapphy@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Honestly, just use Vanadium on GrapheneOS instead of IronFox

It’s more secure and if your browser gets compromised, your phone’s security goes out the window. I’m fine trading a little privacy for better security

[–] TN2VOA@reddthat.com 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'm not going to use a browser without an ad blocker. They claim Vanadium blocks ads, but it does not.

[–] Sapphy@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 days ago
[–] crandall@lemmy.today 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I prefer not using a Chrome browser

[–] nkk@programming.dev 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)
[–] peskypry@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Firefox just rolled out process isolation on Android.

[–] Sapphy@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

It's weaker than Vanadium's OS native isolation, though it's nice to see Firefox catching up about two years later

[–] crandall@lemmy.today 6 points 1 week ago

I know they're right. But I prefer not to use a Chrome browser.

I'm pretty sure that's no longer true as of this year. I don't have a reference, but I remember sandbox site isolation being implemented in Firefox (so Ironfox too)

[–] Sapphy@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago

Secondly, when it comes to browsers, the more you hide, the more you stand out, so try to blend in with most people

You stand out more if you have very strong fingerprint protection, which ironically makes you easier to track since you’re an anomaly

[–] coastallinkedswell@lemmy.ml -4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Are you trying to give internet cancer? Vanadium doesn't even have ad-blocking or fingerprint resistance.

[–] BladeFederation@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago

Vanadium does have ad blocking. It is just not as good as Brave or uBlock Origin.

I do second using a Chromium browser of some kind though. Brave, Vanadium, or Cromite. I understand people who prefer to avoid Chromium, but not sandboxing by site on Android is such a strange thing to avoid implementing for years & years. It defeats a lot of what you're trying to accomplish to use Gecko based browsers. On desktop? Have at it. Android? I wouldn't if you're the type of person who is installing GrapheneOS.

[–] rhythmisaprancer@quokk.au 2 points 1 week ago

Vanadium blocks ads for me 🤷‍♂️