Linux

15211 readers

501 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

Ategon@programming.dev

anzo@programming.dev

dwraf_of_ignorance@programming.dev

Linux kernel devs drop obligatory confession of AI tool usage (www.theregister.com)

submitted 3 hours ago by cm0002@infosec.pub to c/linux@programming.dev

15 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 3 points 55 minutes ago* (last edited 54 minutes ago) (1 children)

That quote was someone else

"LLMs are good enough now," said Greg Kroah-Hartman, a veteran Linux kernel maintainer, at the Linux Foundation's Open Source Summit in South Korea in August. "They've gotten good enough to find bugs because LLMs, AI, are just pattern matchers and code is nothing but patterns in a specific format."

Also to be fair, that quote is about finding bugs and the guy might not have been talking about using AI to patch them. The article makes it sound that way, but the article also seems overly confident and pro-AI about some other things too.

You can deterministically find something that is clearly defined, but bugs don't fall into that category

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 3 points 43 minutes ago

I know, but even regarding bug catching, there have been a LOT of bogus bug reports "discovered by AI" that could not be replicated in any way, shape or form. Granted, I've seen one or two articles saying that AI helped find real software bugs, but what's the ratio there, 1:500 for useful/useless AI bug reports?