this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2026
150 points (97.5% liked)
Videos
18862 readers
602 users here now
For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!
Rules
- Videos only (aside from meta posts flagged with [META])
- Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
- Don't be a jerk
- No advertising
- No political videos, post those to !politicalvideos@lemmy.world instead.
- Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
- Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
- Duplicate posts may be removed
- AI generated content must be tagged with "[AI] …" ^Discussion^
Note: bans may apply to both !videos@lemmy.world and !politicalvideos@lemmy.world
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This entire comment thread is weird, so you more or less agree with me, and agree that it's something they have, but are upset because she's doing it for clicks. We're arguing semantics of the implementation, when the main jist is correct, they're selling client data and many users probably are unaware, which then the problem is that the users probably should be bluntly aware of it. Which leads me to why is she doing it for clicks? I think a bigger question is if this was a man who was trying to raise awareness, would the assumption have been the same, that they were doing it for clicks, or awareness? I don't know man, I'm getting some weird vibes from this thread.
You called out her appearance, called her a chick, then assumed she was doing it for likes. You attacked her argument only by saying she doesn't understand what's happening. Those are three big assumptions that I really wonder if you'd had made about a male creator.