this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2026
193 points (92.9% liked)

Technology

89005 readers
3397 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] anzo@programming.dev 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Did you mean qwen 3.8 max? Or qwen 3 coder next? They are very different.

[–] AmbientChaos@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I've been rocking Qwen 3.8 27b for programming, anyone have an opinion if Coder Next is a better alternative?

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

It’s a mixed bag TBH. The issue is that Qwen 3.8 27B is so good.

It depends on the quant you are running though, and the way you are running it. If you have 16GB or less VRAM and a generous amount of CPU RAM, and you are running a regular GGUF instead of something exotic, Qwen next is probably better, with the right hybrid inference engine.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 9 points 6 days ago

I mean both, for different purposes. They are definitely very different.