this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2026
265 points (90.5% liked)
Ye Power Trippin' Bastards
1923 readers
214 users here now
This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.
Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.
Posting Guidelines
All posts should follow this basic structure:
- Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
- What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
- Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
- Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
- Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.
Rules
- Post only about bans or other sanctions that you have received from a mod or admin.
- Don’t use private communications to prove your point. We can’t verify them and they can be faked easily.
- Don’t deobfuscate mod names from the modlog with admin powers.
- Don’t harass mods or brigade comms. Don’t word your posts in a way that would trigger such harassment and brigades.
- Do not downvote posts if you think they deserved it. Use the comment votes (see below) for that.
- You can post about power trippin’ in any social media, not just lemmy. Feel free to post about reddit or a forum etc.
- If you are the accused PTB, while you are welcome to respond, please do so within the relevant post.
- Keep the comments in YPTB posts about the moderation action itself, not about the general topic in which the moderation took place.
Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.
Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.
YPTB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.
Some acronyms you might see.
- PTB - Power-Tripping Bastard: The commenter agrees with you this was a PTB mod.
- YDI - You Deserved It: The commenter thinks you deserved that mod action.
- YDM new - You Deserved More: The commenter thinks you got off too lightly.
- BPR - Bait-Provoked Reaction: That mod probably overreacted in charged situation, or due to being baited.
- CLM - Clueless Mod: The mod probably just doesn't understand how their software works.
Relevant comms
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Well you definitely broke rule 4:
YDI for being an annoying
, although maybe a permanent ban is a bit harsh.
"off-topic" about electoralism
I'm sorry but what are you on about? Leftists are rightly "flaring up" in response to "Vote Blue"-types like you actually shitting up our spaces. You're trying to guilt us into accommodating your individual incoherent liberal sensitivities. Well I'm done moderating my politics to be legible to liberals. If you really cannot stop yourself from going to the polls then at least shut up about them in revolutionary spaces.
And I'm coming at you as an anarchist, not a ML. We should be building dual power in direct opposition to the State and capitalism, not dancing in their fucking circuses! When you step into a revolutionary space and whine about voting, you suck out oxygen to discuss the thing we're actually...here...to discuss!
You wanna go to the polls? Do it in shame and silence.
Ayyy that's a wild accusation coming from the person voting for one of the pro-genocide parties.
I would sooner saw my own head off. Death to
.
Setting aside your incoherent off-topic tirade, I really don't see how this would violate that rule. Advocating for voting in general is not inherently lesser evil rhetoric, nor did they say anything against third parties. So this seems pretty clearly not a violation of that rule.
I fail to see how that's not lesser-evil rhetoric.
It's actually not incoherent; it's a consistent if emphatic application of anti-electoralist anarchist analysis. You just don't like what I have to say or how I say it.
I spoilered the stuff that doesn't strictly have to do with the moderation action to declutter the feed, but I stand by what I said and how I said it.
And I usually try not to be this venomous towards electoralists, and I won't be that venomous towards you...but this user called us (anti-electoralists) neo-nazis. That's a very serious accusation which I will not take lying down!
Did I miss a comment? The one I looked at did not say that. It just said voting is a good idea. I also did not see where they called anti-electoralists neo-Nazis. If that's the reason they got banned it would make more sense.
But I was mainly sniping your tirade because we're not supposed to be arguing with the comment here, we're supposed to be discussing the rules and whether OP deserved to be banned. Whether we agree with them isn't super relevant--although I guess it can be if we want to discuss whether given rules have merit or not, so maybe there is some gray area.
That's because you're assuming the lesser evil is always the one in second place. If you don't think any 3rds have the potential to break into that coveted political standing between the red and blue teams, that's on you.
My posts only expressed hostility to MAGA, which summoned defensive tankies like a swarm of flies closing in on a freshly dropped turd. The longer I'm on this website, the more I'm noticing that behavior. It's gotten to the point that I'm questioning if "tankies" are even a thing, or if that's just a shitty attempt to conceal their red caps and klan robes under a poorly executed online persona for 'lols'.
I digress - my suspicion of tankies is off topic, outside of their overt and consistent support for MAGA and ilk, which I did call out in the previous thread.
I mean, what you said here was:
Like it's not only campists who use the terminology "blue MAGA". Anarchists and other non-campist revolutionaries rightly use the terminology (although I would personally not label someone reluctantly going to the polls as "Blue MAGA"; I would use that term for someone more emphatic and supportive of the policies that liberal politicians are responsible for). Followed by
Like can you see where I'm coming from here? If you really didn't mean to call all anti-electoralists neo-nazis then... okay I guess, but that's not how I read it.
Tbh, that's really what motivated me to speak up. Like I'm willing to agree to disagree with my comrades about whether or not they individually show up to the polls, even though my viewpoint is emphatically against electoralism as praxis, but I (and I think some other people) read your post as if you were comparing your anti-electoralist comrades to neo-nazis.
I mean, from an anarchist perspective ... it's not at all shocking that people have recognized that some hierarchies are unacceptable while not (yet?) realizing that the State is inherently one such hierarchy, which is itself responsible for maintaining those other hierarchies. For a different example, many liberals clearly recognize that racism and sexism and homophobia are unjustifiable hierarchies, to the point that some are even doing very noble work in stopping ICE...but they still have not figured out the underlying pattern (hierarchical social relations).
The campists you're running into here are probably not Trump supporters. It's just that..."America bad" is a correct answer 99% of the time, and 99% is good enough for some people to round it up to 100%. (And even in the 0.1% where it's not the correct answer...it is true because America is bad, it's just not a helpful answer.) IMO campism is a cognitive distortion, but it's understandable where it comes from.
I may be misusing the term? My understanding (gained entirely through context in posts like this discussion - so if it was misused in those cases, then I'm parroting an error) is that it's kind of false flag effort to lure anyone left of the fascists currently running the country to dispersing their support to a wider array of easier-to-defeat opponents. Divide and conquer kinda situation. Idk if there's any kind of 'coined' meaning, I thought it was just internet slang.
I do see where your coming from. And frankly I agree with a lot of it, which is why the idea of 'blue MAGA' (or whatever we're calling the shit I described above) is getting me so worked up: it's deceptive, with the goal of tricking actually decent people into supporting something awful.
In any case -- All anti-electoralists? certainly not. Anti-electoralism isn't what I have an issue with. You're sick of being forced to choose any evil, lesser or otherwise. I get the fuck out of that. The state of our elections is abysmal, in which "vote for me because I'm not the other guy" is often the literal only selling point. It's exhausting, it doesn't work, it needs to go away. The shitty reality is that we're in that system whether we like it or not; and the options presented within are NOT equal - one of those options of going full Nazi right now, and when I call MAGA Nazis, I'm not saying that as an insult, I'm saying they're actually acting like Nazis. If we're a given any power at all that be used against Nazis, we should use it whether or not we approve of the system it exists in.
In short, I agree with your disapproval of the process; it's shit. I disagree with the notion that participating in voting is equal to supporting that system. We (collectively) need to be more strategic with our resources. Vote for the least shit option within a shit system; riot to break the system and reform it into something that's actually humane.
I kinda got ahead of myself with the previous paragraphs, but basically the same spiel here. There's no shame in participating in a system that you're stuck in anyway, especially if that participation can nudge it away from Nazism.
...I mean, hopefully not. I try to give anyone the benefit of the doubt by default (although that's feeling increasingly naive). Yourself included. What I have to question though, is what's the goal? Especially here - Lemmy seems to be a mostly left-leaning space, so spreading notions of a false equivalence between Trump/his mini-Nazis, with is going to detract from the effort to oppose him. And even if you intend to engage in other more impactful, high-risk-high-reward activism, why skip the vote? Voting is way less effort and way less risk, and I can't stress this enough, doesn't stop you from any other action.
America bad. I get it. Let's maybe try to make it not bad. Or at least less bad to start with. Discouraging voter turnout isn't going to accomplish that.
Edit - I just saw the mod post here warning against soap-boxing about voting, which is 100% what you and I are doing. We should probably move this conversation to PMs if you want to keep it rolling. We're getting way outside the scope of what I posted in LSC.
Hahahahahah hahahahahaha ok
Yeah, not venemous to leftists who are electoralists. I've already clocked you as a liberal snake 🐍
I "clocked" you as having nothing but venom unless someone agrees with you. Then I read your screed against voting and I knew what you are. Snake doesn't cover it.
Well your clock is busted. I've had loads of polite disagreements with people on Lemmy. Although tbh I am a bit more contentious on the .world subs you frequent because, well, .world is a liberal shit hole and it is incredibly cathartic to yell at liberals.
I find it cathartic to tell fake leftists that I see through their lies, but I rarely do it until some moron writes a long tirade against the concept of voting because they're actually a magat.
dawg thats u tho
Does TrickDacy claim to be a leftist?? I thought they were a proud lib
they're talking about 'fake leftists' like they're an authority, though it's probably because they so badly want liberals to be considered part of the left.
ya know, all part of centering the left around 'people who vote democrat' rather than 'people who oppose capitalism'
Ah, yeah that makes sense lol
... do you really think I'm a MAGAt? Like do you really think I actually support Donald Trump?
No shit I don't want that pedocapitalist in office. No shit I don't want any of his lackeys in office. But more fundamentally, I don't want anyone in office. There shouldn't be an
, full stop. But more concretely, the Dems have basically sat on their hands and done nothing in Trump 2.0. Establishment Dems only complained that they didn't get to sign off on Trump's demonic abuses, and non-Establishment Dems are comfortable enough with the perpetrators of the Gaza genocide to give them their time and energy.
The anti-electoralist position is the somber realization that the State is not controllable from a working class perspective. No amount of working within the system will ever allow us to meaningfully steer the trajectory of the system. Elections are simply ratifications of what the capitalist class has already planned for us. Hence why the Gaza genocide wasn't on the ballot. Hence why the abolition of ICE wasn't on the ballot. Hence why police abolition, hell even defunding the police, was not on the ballot.
Like there's almost no daylight between the Biden admin and Trump 2.0 and you want me to play along like I, as an anarchist, have a stake in the fate of the duopoly. Hell nah. Burn it all to the fucking ground.
Welp. There went all your credibility.
Now you know how most of the people who use lemmy feel when they see you use the word tankie, lol.
It's great that your profile picture is a clown because now I don't even have to call you one
Creative.
Anyways. Would you like to understand how credibility works so you don't keep hurting yourself in your confusion?
When you use a derogatory term against someone you are arguing with, others can see that you have no valid argument and have resorted to name calling to score some kind of imaginary points.
For example, other than MAGAts, who deserve all the derision aimed their way, I haven't created some kind of derogatory term for adherents to the other ideologies I don't agree with. I don't agree with Libertarianism or Anarchism, but I haven't created some dumbass term to try to belittle them.
Unfortunately, for someone of your limited intellect, it seems that doing exactly that is the only ammo you've got in your tiny little weapon.
Edit: Ah, it appears you are a self-professed anti-voter. Now I don't feel so bad implying that you aren't very intelligent.
a lot of complaining about calling people liberal as a derogatory term but then practically every comment of yours is you being derogatory about peoples intelligence for disagreeing
i was gonna agree with that, but then i got to the part of their post where they say that everyone pushing back on blue maga are neonazis
A shocking comment from someone who uses the word liberal to insult anyone who even slightly disagrees with them.
Well maybe if you weren't being a liberal I wouldn't have to call you a liberal 😑
Yep it's just me and definitely not anyone who challenges you.
It's you and other shitlibs with whom I am unapologetically contentious.
It's like you're a masochist who gets off destroying their credibility in an argument.
Why exactly does the word "shitlib" invalidate my credibility? I made my opposition to liberal capitalism explicit at every step of my output on the Fediverse.
You must not be very smart if you can't tell the difference between disagreeing with something and destroying your own credibility by using derogatory terms in regards to it.
Get yourself back in school. It'll do wonders for you.
Like the word magat?
Okay whatever. All of this is technically off topic as per the mods' comment, so feel free to yell at me next time you see me elsewhere
Not me, I'm nonconfrontational 😇
Use of that word kinda gives you away, fraud.
The word "shitlibs"? What are you smoking and can I have some?
I don't smoke meth, sorry.
Okay but what about the word "shitlibs" do you have a problem with?
Like I am openly an anarcho-communist. I openly oppose liberalism, as it is the umbrella of philosophies that capitalists used to justify their hierarchical and authoritarian practices.
Lol sure you are. So full of principles.
I will ask once again: what about the word "shitlibs" do you have a problem with?
If you're actually a leftist, then certainly you should have no issues with a fellow leftist using a pejorative term for liberals to describe liberals, right? Because as a leftist, you are not a liberal, since liberals do not oppose capitalism, and you are likely frustrated with how liberal monoculture dominates all political discussions, right? And it's not as if "shitlib" is a term of bigotry. Like I'm just taking the self-identified label of one faction of the capitalist enemy and adding the word "shit" to it.