this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2026
442 points (94.7% liked)

Programmer Humor

34043 readers
1616 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jbloggs777@discuss.tchncs.de 31 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Someone is an optimist...

Why photoshop an XKCD comic?

[–] ignotum@lemmy.world 36 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I assume they mean the new standard, good or bad as it might be, simply isn't adopted, so we are still stuck with the 14 bad ones

Edit: I misread it, but this would also make for a good variation of the original :P

[–] stormdelay@sh.itjust.works 58 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I read it more like the new, better standard is never developed because someone used the real xkcd as an argument against making the new standard

[–] ignotum@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago

Oh wow yeah not sure how i didn't notice that she responds with the original comic, you're absolutely right

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I have another way to see it: There is a good new standard but the bad old ones stick around. Like Torx, there is still a ton of Philips etc.

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I know. Hence the change, there can be good standards but they do not magically make the others disappear.

[–] Signtist@bookwyr.me 7 points 2 weeks ago

Pretty sure it's trying to say these people would have maybe made a better standard, but didn't try because they read the original comic and didn't want to make a 15th shitty standard.