this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2026
179 points (97.4% liked)

Programmer Humor

33743 readers
2936 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

"Mostly", that's commendable optimism on your part. Not mostly but entirely. It's the entirety of the key: 4.

https://emudhra.we-have-a-problem.com/

Edit: the source I wanted to link is down, probably server overwhelm. Ask the search engine of your choice for emudhra.

[–] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Wasn’t it a bunch of zeros followed by a 4?

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Yes... but no. You probably saw a rendering error.

The private keys in question were only eight bits in length (decimal values 0 to 255). A proper key for the specific encryption should have been 384 bits, or about 116 decimal digits. If a string format function expects a 384 bit number, but only receives 8, it might fill out the missing places with zeroes.

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 14 points 1 day ago

I've been lead to believe that that makes no difference.

[–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago

Hahaha, yeah just read it. Amazing...