Not The Onion

22807 readers

850 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

kescusay@lemmy.world

486

Palmer Luckey raies $200,000,000 to genetically engineer dogs for war (dangerousminds.net)

submitted 3 days ago by Infrapink@thebrainbin.org to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

229 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Palmer Luckey of Anduril is teaming with Ben Lamm of Colossal Biosciences to launch Warhound, a startup dedicated to genetically engineering and cloning dogs for service in war, police work and first responder work.

Speaking to Wired, Lamm explained that the project was twofold. One part of the project would oversee the genetic engineering and cloning of the ideal dogs for war, and the other would develop tech for them to use on battlefields.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Carmakazi@piefed.social 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

In my opinion, police dogs, in the US at least, are a vestigial cultural holdover from law enforcement's slave catching past. There isn't really a good tactical reason to be using them that couldn't be performed by other equipment. They are unreliable, expensive, and get shot surprisingly often. If you really interrogated why they still use attack dogs, their answer would be that those people are scared of them.

Other than that, scenthounds are just probable cause generators which are all probably trained to alert on command.

[–] decolo@piefed.social 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Police dogs are analogous to whips, in that they are an ineffective weapon against an equal enemy but good at reducing the morale of slaves.

(sorry if I'm just restating your point, I think it's an important one)

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 3 days ago

I'd been tracking detection dogs more than attack dogs, and yeah police dogs in use have false-positive rates sometimes 90%+. US precincts call them probable cause on four legs.

The sad thing is there's a detection dog sector that resents the current misuse culture since its delegitimizing good faith uses.

Maybe once we can overhaul how policing and investigation are done, we can restrict detection dogs to instances where high false positive rates will be counter productive. Say, sniffing for explosives at an airport at a long line of luggage.