this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2026
308 points (95.3% liked)

Videos

18924 readers
75 users here now

For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!

Rules

  1. Videos only (aside from meta posts flagged with [META])
  2. Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
  3. Don't be a jerk
  4. No advertising
  5. No political videos, post those to !politicalvideos@lemmy.world instead.
  6. Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
  7. Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
  8. Duplicate posts may be removed
  9. AI generated content must be tagged with "[AI] …" ^Discussion^

Note: bans may apply to both !videos@lemmy.world and !politicalvideos@lemmy.world

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I know we have our complaints about the browser, but I liked this one :)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] iturnedintoanewt@lemmy.world 130 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I'd prefer less ads, less budget for the CEO and less shady AI and crap opted in by default.

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 44 points 2 days ago (1 children)

true and I agree to all of that, but this ad is actually nice.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago

I also think some outreach is important, especially if they can get that through memes instead of paying Facebook/Google.

Having more people using Firefox instead of Google chrome is a good thing. If nothing else, websites will have more of an incentive to make sure websites work on non-chromium browsers.

And hey, if a few of those new users donate to the project, they can be less reliant on Google and sponsored content

[–] emmy5482@quokk.au 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] LLMhater1312@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago

And libre wolf!

[–] iturnedintoanewt@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Waterfox didn't come out of thin air, though. It still needs Firefox to provide an updated browser code so they can do their changes. I doubt they could handle a full browser standalone on their own.

[–] emmy5482@quokk.au 2 points 1 day ago

Oh yeah. But, they rip out all the ai. I'll stick with that until Firefox makes it impossible (which they almost certainly will).

I'll move on after that.

An LLM in my browser is completely unnecessary and actively useless

[–] GuyDudeman@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How about no AI and crap opted-in by default? Seriously, Vivaldi is great for my needs, and I haven't had any problems using ublock origin and other ad blocking extensions with it.

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I like Vivaldi, but in my experience, LibreWolf is even better at blocking some of the worst ads.

[–] GuyDudeman@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

But does YouTube work with it?

Sorry can't do 80% of my revenue is from Google