Linux

15321 readers

276 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

Ategon@programming.dev

anzo@programming.dev

dwraf_of_ignorance@programming.dev

Linux Distribution Chooser Tool (unknownuniverse.uk)

submitted 1 day ago by cm0002@no.lastname.nz to c/linux@programming.dev

23 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I'm thinking Arch is definitely for me, then:

I prefer bleeding edge. No delay, things haven't broken my system in a decade, seems like it's fine for personal use anyway.
I don't need any kernel patches as a heavy gamer, my system can run whatever you throw at it.
The AUR seems to have a far simpler and less convoluted process for contributing than GURU.

Still, I'm curious: what kernel patches do you feel the need to apply, as a gamer?

[–] cadekat@pawb.social 2 points 5 hours ago

You can enable the bleeding edge too, if you like. The repos have multiple versions of packages.

I need the bigsceen beyond patches for better VR support.

I've never contributed to the AUR, so I can't really compare. GURU does have a bit of process in exchange for some oversight, but there are completely unmoderated overlays too.

That's completely fair! I think pacman is a much nicer to use package manager than emerge, and Arch has a great community :3