this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2026
19 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

5204 readers
81 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I literally studied metallic sunscreen in university lol. Zinc and titanium sunscreens do settle because the particles are large, "invisible" nanoparticulate sunscreen (often not labelled because aus regs work on mean size not range) has particles that stay suspended because of Brownian motion and accumulate in fish embroys and fuck shit up in corals and bivalves (at least).

Organic sunscreens (the oily kind common because nobody wants to look like a custard pie hit them) are toxic to shitloads of marine life.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X2500102X

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0025326X26004108

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12302-021-00515-w (indicates that organic evidence has become murkier since I studied)

If you're gonna be smug and condescending at least have the decency to be right

There's even an environment effects section on wikipedia. This shit is mainstream https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunscreen

edit: also the article is not spending much time on the scandal and instead dicussing how SPF inflation is a marketing gimmick and more important is proper and regular application (why people keep getting UV damage)

[–] No1@aussie.zone 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

What sunscreens do you recommend?

[–] naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 20 hours ago

If you're concerned about marine life the most significant thing most people can do is go vegan. Run off from cattle farms, crops grown to feed or "finishʾ cattle, fish farms and fishing are completely and utterly devastating.

If you want serious sun protection the pasty metallic ones (sometimes marketed as mineral sunscreen) that aren't invisible/nanoparticle stuff work great, are seemingly less bad for marine life, and because you can actually see them you can tell when they need reapplying because you've wiped some off.

Most people don't want to look like they're getting even for blackface's sake though. Nanoparticle sunscreen might not be as bad as some organics but I am extremely warey of anything long lived that bioaccumulates given our amazing track record.

So if you want a balance between not looking stupid and probably not singlehandedly causing bleaching events (again it's negligible next to not deliberately killing stuff in the ocean and the carbon emissions of carnism) then organic sunscreens that avoid the ingredients banned in Hawaii (oxybenzone and octinoxate) don't seem too bad (it's also understudied though, and results in petri dishes aren't always applicable to the world). Banana boat has a reasonable track record and several of these available.