this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2026
907 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

89355 readers
3806 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 days ago (3 children)

LOL when I read it my first impression was: Oh wow, I didn't know UK also had a city called Kentucky, good that they pointed out it is not in US.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (3 children)

If there was a Kentucky in the UK then the one in the US would be called New Kentucky?

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 days ago

No, we have tons of direct names from the UK, and many other places. We have Londons, Norfolks, Portsmouths, and probably any other major city or region in Britain.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I’m from Connecticut, the town names of which* fall roughly into three categories: Native American names, biblical place names, and English names. Under the latter category, we have new Britain and new London (arguably the only two which fit that pattern, though maybe New Haven is referencing an older British city I don’t know about), but we also have Manchester, Bolton, and Glastonbury, and of course just English language words or last names, like Plainville, Plainfield, and Putnam.

*This is also true for most other New England states and probably most of the east coast, with substitution for French or Spanish (and a little Dutch) for English/British as appropriate. Actually, I could see this being mostly true everywhere in the US, with the relevant settling nationality taking over for British town names and last names, but I could also see biblical place names being less popular in some states, maybe superseded by other religious references.

[–] cokeslutgarbage@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There's also a New Boston in MA right over the border from Colebrook, CT

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

The normal Boston in Massachusetts was originally named after the Lincolnshire village town of Saint botolph, iirc, so new Boston probably refers to a new offshoot of Boston, MA, like CT’s new Milford/new Hartford, but I’d be lying if I said I knew.

[–] scutiger@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Like New Boston, right?

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

good that they pointed out it is not in US.

Huh? It is in the USA.

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They wrote: "at the University of Kentucky (UK)", they could write "at the University of Kentucky (a.k.a. UK)" or "at the UK (University of Kentucky)" any of those would be less ambiguous.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

Countries are offset with a comma, not put in parentheses, so maybe University of Kentucky (UK), USA?

[–] sys110x@aussie.zone 1 points 3 days ago

David Durman, a research administrator at the University of Kentucky (UK)

I'm with you - why abbreviate the university like that? I immediately thought the UK (United Kingdom) too. Something like "University of Kentucky (aka UK)" would've been helpful.