this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2026
907 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

89355 readers
3473 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

One is a way of thinking, the other is an interpretation of reality.

[–] dou9m@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“an interpretation of reality”… so it’s just a re-occurring thought lmao?

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No it's a set of fundamental assumptions about the nature of the universe and reality.

[–] dou9m@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Where a christian would draw faith from their spiritual deity, a humanist might draw faith from the fact that they’re alive because of the human spirit, no? A “spirit” which only exists because an absurdly bizarre amount of coincidences happened… so many in fact, that it honestly makes total sense that even the most intelligent people among us could believe (or in my perspective: fall for) that it was actually instead the doing of a being who is in a completely different realm of existence from our own.

I promise I’m not just being pedantic or whatever, I’m truly trying to understand how there’s any difference between a philosophy effectively based on some santa-clause-tier shit and one simply based on the (actually phenomenal) evidence we have available.

Hell, I even grew up as a christian before I gained full consciousness and wondered why the fuck god would torture me with a life that is so comically filled with absolute horrors that go beyond anything I would comprehend on my own.

[–] Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The other one is bullshit *

And philosophy isn't bullshit for sure.

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I dunno, some philosophy is bullshit

[–] Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, but just because all then all philosophy is bullshit. Some movies are bullshit but not for that the cinema and all the movies are bullshit too.

Anyways, every statement, even stating that philosophy is bullshit or isn't knowledge, is a philosophic statement to some degree or another.

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 days ago

Arguably every religion would fit in that