this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2026
1173 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

89311 readers
4008 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com 17 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

So what Sam Altman is suggesting the part of socialism that makes people fear it (extreme utilitarianism run by falliable if not biased leaders) without the part that makes people support it (a more equitable distribution of wealth that makes sure everyone's needs are met and the removal of an influential class that perpetuates undesirable and unnecessary conditions for their own personal gain.)

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

extreme utilitarianism run by falliable if not biased leaders

Uh, the US already has that

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

They got the shit leadership, but not the utilitarianism.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

They got the shit leadership, but not the utilitarianism.

Tell that to the jobless who are being evicted from their rented homes.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

But utilitarianism suggests that it is at least in service to some sort of valued utility. It's just stupid bullshit and corruption.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

utilitarianism suggests that it is at least in service to some sort of valued utility.

Yeah, the utility is in increasing the wealth of the rich at the expense of the poor.

It’s just stupid bullshit and corruption.

Yes, increasing the wealth of the rich at the expense of the poor is stupid corruption.

[–] basiclemmon98@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

It is NOT Utilitarian. It does not try to help and serve the majority with well allocated resources, only allows businesses to have large scale production.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

It does not try to help and serve the majority with well allocated resources

That's utilitarian. Its just utilitarian in very different ways for different classes. It ultimately provides help and resources to the Epstein class.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk -2 points 12 hours ago

So just capitalism then.