this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2026
96 points (93.6% liked)

Technology

89409 readers
4088 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 25 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Zero useful information. Just quotes. What does brave do??

[–] dgdft@lemmy.world 56 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (4 children)

The court filing is linked in the first paragraph and worth a read. The article is a bit vague because the claims in the filing are pretty sweeping, but to list some highlights:

  • Brave started selling copyrighted scraped articles in bulk from their search index to AI companies
  • Brave built explicit and targeted functionality into their browser to circumvent newspaper paywalls
  • Brave repeats long, verbatim sections of NYT & other papers’ material on request through their AI web search feature

I’m neither an attorney nor a huge fan of IP rights writ large, but in my reading, the newspapers are making a pretty strong case that Brave is consciously stealing and reselling copyrighted material in unaltered form for monetary gain.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

IP rights are pretty awesome for a lot of engineers, writers and artists.

Regardless, anyone who's paywall can be defeated by a little JS switcheroo has dogshit for a paywall. If I have apple trees in my yard, and my fence is made of 7 or 8 sticks, when people stop by and snack on an apple, should I be mad at them or myself?

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Is it possible that Brave is accessing NYT through NYT subscribers using their browser?

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Sure, but it might be hard for NYT to make the case for that. All the browser fingerprint would say is "Chrome" and have spoofed data after that.

I expect they did some trial and error to demonstrate what's happening before filling a lawsuit over it.

That being said, NYT just told everyone how to get free NYT. Best advertising Brave ever had.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

Also, I think the NYT made it easy to bypass so they can pick up the non-savvy or richer readers who otherwise wouldn't pay for something that is literally free, while still not limitting access and thereby reach. It might not be incompetence.

It's a hard balance to strike, because the best advertising for your paper is articles people send to each other. If nobody can read them, then nobody will become intrigued by a subscription, but if they are totally free nobody will bother subscribing.

That's why some sites have a certain number of free articles a month.

[–] chaosCruiser@futurology.today 10 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Gotta say, all of that is on brand. Any company messing around with crypto has to have some shady tactics.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 7 points 20 hours ago

The paywall bypass is not like the others

[–] Tiger@sh.itjust.works -2 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Thank you for the summary. Ironically, this makes me want to try Brave again, ha.

[–] SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I would love for someone to correct me if I’m wrong but wasn’t brave one of the ones who would block the ads of a website just to see newer their own? So not only are you not supporting the website, you still see ads.

[–] Tiger@sh.itjust.works 2 points 15 hours ago

Yeah, they’re shady, no doubt, I won’t really try them again. I’ll keep using Firefox and Librewolf and I use Kagi for search and like their AI summaries. I do like tools for accessing gated news when I need it, though, which was what piqued my interest.

It's it basically the same idea as a residential proxy? Using user browsers to scrape sites and then sell for AI training.

[–] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 23 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

The newspapers said in the complaints, opens new tab ​that Brave illegally sells their content to AI companies including ​Anthropic, Perplexity and xAI — which are not defendants in the ⁠cases — in addition to infringing their copyrights by allowing users to ​access their articles for free

The outlets' lawsuits ​filed on ⁠Monday said that Brave "acts both like a burglar that misappropriates the content of publishers, and an AI 'fence' that ​sells stolen content to third parties"

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 points 8 hours ago

Yes I read that too. It's all allegations still. Did brave make a home-IP botnet?

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 25 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

That moment when you don't even know who you want to lose more

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 10 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Brave is the commercial arm of a far right hate group.

I'd say that's worse than a news website with paywalls.

[–] Cricket@lemmy.zip 6 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Brave is the commercial arm of a far right hate group.

Do you mind providing more details, for those of us who aren't informed about this? Is it something aside from their CEO?

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 1 points 18 minutes ago

Is it something aside from their CEO?

It's the CEO and founder and that's plenty.

[–] UiUiUiUiUi@piefed.nl 4 points 18 hours ago

Let their lawsuits be long and their lawyers slow and costly.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 4 points 20 hours ago

Maybe they lose on the paywall bypass but not on the AI bullshit.