this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2026
136 points (92.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

44404 readers
1052 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] epyon22@sh.itjust.works 41 points 1 day ago (9 children)

Say what you will the Iran war has pushed many people and countries to renewable energy.

I honestly don't completely understand the conservative agenda against renewable energy it allows independence at so many levels. Never have to see a gas pump again. Use the electricity from your house or a solar panel.

[–] iusemybrain@sh.itjust.works 4 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

I think there's a very simple explanation, the renewables as in solar and wind energy generation methods show that the world isn't perfect, that even ignoring the basic notion that natural gas and coal generate CO2 emissions; natural gas, U-235 (used for nuclear power generation), and coal are of a finite supply.

That destroys their ideology that we live in this perfect world with infinite resources, because most conservatives come from a religious background. They are beyond condescending (I know this because I lived in one), even with the world crumbling from gas prices and food, I don't think they'll even give a damn that prices are exponentially growing. They live in this fabricated environment abstracted away from the rest of the world.

[–] Rednax@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

We have enough minable nuclear fuel to sustain our current power needs for a couple billion years. And with enough technological gains, we can extend that to well past the time that the sun has died. Hence, it is safe to consider it renewable.

Doesn't invalidate your point, but I just wanted to point this nugget of info out.

[–] iusemybrain@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 hours ago

Each uranium rod has a life of around 6 years before needing replacement, the relative abudance of uranium-235 is about 0.9% compared to uranium 238 which has 98℅

Sure, the decay chain of uranium 235 is long, but the usability of in converting it to nuclear power the uranium rods last 6 years, not billions.

Even if we take all our uranium-235 reserves (which is about 56,304 kilo-tonnes of uranium-235)

1.) It's unrealistic because we use U-235 for other things 2.) This is a global reserve. Countries haven't made peace with another yet.

I know niche points, i'll admit I really dug through the barrel with this one. Nuclear power plants are also quite expensive to maintain and build since these are often built based on the selected site. Also very inefficient as each reaction loses 1.4 neutrons (or else kaboom).

These reasons are why (despite it generating 17℅ of the US electricity with only 92 reactors), countries don't invest more into nuclear power. Inefficiency + large costs make it unappealing compared to wind which generates 40℅ or even 60℅ (with offshore) of the energy the wind pushes.

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I honestly don't completely understand the conservative agenda against renewable energy

Because they’re owned by the oil companies, simple as that.

[–] DeckPacker@piefed.social 7 points 14 hours ago

This, 100%.

Trying to tie this to any aspect of conservative "ideology" is misguided, because conservatives don't have a consistent ideology.

[–] Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk 7 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

UK here, I had solar panels and a battery installed. My electric bill has gone from being £100-£150 a month down to £20. And that's with an electric car.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Estonia here, electric bill ~300 EUR in the winter here, once I get the entire house heated using a heat pump and get an electric car, it might be more like 600-700 EUR. But solar panels are useless in the winter here.

Meanwhile in the season where I could have solar panels produce all of my electricity, my bill is well under 100€ and I couldn't sell the electricity to the grid either unless I have a big ass battery to sell only at night when the price is actually a positive number lol

[–] Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Are you sure about them not working?

Its been cloudy here all day and they were still generating a kilowatt per hour at around 11am.

Also, we have tariffs here where electricity in the day is more expensive but its dirt cheap at night. So when the battery needs it, I top it up overnight from the grid. 10kwh costs me £0.80p (1€) instead of £3.50 (5€). Do you have anything like that?

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

That far north the winter nights are long and the sun less intense. Still, they'll make some power, even if cloudy.

[–] acchariya@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

Mount your panels vertically, and just get more of them. The panels are the cheap part and as long as you stay under the max open voltage you can keep adding more to match your inverter

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 16 hours ago

And donalds & musks shenanigans have solidified the EU and the fight for democracy and independence too.

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 2 points 16 hours ago

I think at this point it's fair to say that they are just dumb as fuck. Imagine for a second you live in your house, that generates it's own electricity, the electricity is used to heat your home and water via heat pump. The same electricity is fueling your car over night. Electricity is out, no, not for you it isn't.

Somwhow they got convinced that this is terrible, your car doesn't make a loud wrooom anymore? Fuck you! Then they take away the gas stoves that gives them cancer? NO!

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Genuine independence on an individual level is at odds with nationalism

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

But green energy represents independence on a national level as well, should be a no-brainer for any given ideology.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 hours ago

Well no, because some ideologies require people to be dependent and easily controlled so that they won't discard the ideology for being garbage.

[–] insanemantis@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

And that's where we realize that the two party system is hollow and doesn't actually represent anything other than greed

If the GOP actually stood for tradition, we would go back to single income households

If the GOP actually stood for self-determination, anyone could change their gender on legal documents

If the GOP actually stood for hard work and personal responsibility, taxes would be proportionately higher for the mega rich, and the working class would be getting proper compensation

If the GOP actually stood for the 2nd amendment, Alex Pretti wouldn't have been shot to death simply for having a gun on his waist

If the GOP actually stood for Christianity, there would be homes for the homeless everywhere

If the GOP actually stood for isolationism, then this country would not be practicing genocidal foreign policy

And if the GOP actually stood for small government, well there wouldn't be this whole... craziness

Edit: why the booing? If I'm wrong then tell me why you think that

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Any downvotes are people thinking you're promoting "they're both the same". Though I'm not sure why you called out the two party system and only highlighted the GOP.

[–] insanemantis@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Well we're on the subject of the GOP, so of course I'll be focusing on their contradictions. If I gave the democratic party a similar treatment then I'd be writing an essay

[–] lntl@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

Comrade Trump has made public statements on the billions the US oil industry has profited during his reign.

[–] wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io 4 points 1 day ago
  1. It’s change from the norm they’ve grown up on. Change is antithetical to conservatism.
  2. Identity. Conservatism is more tribal.
  3. Red team vs. blue team - if it harms the “other” then it’s probably good. With a helping of “I want you to hurt like me” mixed in.

We lost the conservatives when Carter espoused it and Reagan dismissed it.