this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2026
1280 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

89443 readers
4292 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 8 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Your first sentence is basically impossible. When reviewing code, your insight is always inferior to the person who wrote it. Often my code reviews consist of questioning the programmer on why they've done what they have, because I need their perspective as well.

You can't do that with an LLM because it doesn't really know why it did things.

And testing properly....? Nobody does that. LLM or human.

[–] AliOski@feddit.nl 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I disagree with this. Just reviewing the code is exactly what I mean by "properly being checked and tested".

There are people/companies that just vibe code the hell out of their stuff without any review whatsoever. That's not something I want to touch.

[–] pemptago@lemmy.ml 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Just reviewing the code

I was warming up to this. It certainly is better than vibe coding, but I've started to see libraries [with this ai policy] push out bigger releases faster with bad ergonomics and unnecessary, undocumented breaking changes, because the ai quietly migrated the internal tests/examples.

Clearly, they're reviewing large amounts with an eye on new features and they're not thinking through ergonomics: spending time with it, writing it themselves, and seeing where the sticking points are.

Maybe if you're using ai for the migration, then-- problem avoided, for now. As time goes on I could see it compounding and becoming a tangled mess that's not only inaccessible to humans, but requires more and more compute to navigate than thoughtful, handcrafted code.