1273
this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2026
1273 points (99.5% liked)
Technology
89443 readers
4292 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The term genocide has two very distinct meanings. One is the juridical meaning, and I believe there is enough substance to have this disputed at the ICC. I'm all for bringing netanyahu and his bunch to justice, and even should the genocide not hold up for some reason, there certainly will be enough evidence crimes against humanity so they can serve a long long time.
The other is the moral meaning. But in my eyes this is very overused by the antizionist zeal. It was already used right on October 7th before Israel did any reaction to the hamas attacks, and for every single action since. The story of the boy who cried wolf comes to mind.
it's arguments like this which makes the movement seem so uneducated:
The Nazis took every single Jew (and communist, and disabled or homosexual person, or any other scapegoat group) of any age they could find, in Germany, or any conquered country and put them into wagon trains. The trains would take the victims to Dachau or another concentration and working camp, if they were lucky. Dachau is a museum nowadays, school classes go in there joking, and come out very very sober. It's worth a visit.
If they were less lucky they would be brought to Auschwitz or Treblinka or another of the 6 extermination camps. There they were carefully registered, stripped of clothes, dignity and anything remotely of worth, and then either put directly into the gas chambers. Or they were put into the camp from which workers were selected for moving the bodies into the furnaces. Alternatively, from the camp they were picked for a death march, or a ride on a truck, where the exhaust was funneled into the loading area, with the purpose to asphyxiate the victims. Or they were picked for experiments from the likes of Joseph Mengele. Or or or ...
The list of Nazi crimes is much longer than this. And it is also very well documented. These things happened without a doubt.
I see many accusations against the IDF, and the list of accusations of crimes against humanity is long and worth following through before the ICC. But the Nazi comparison only shows you have no real historic perspective.
I am well aware of history, thank you. I've been to Dachau and Auschwitz. It was horrible.
You are making a difference without distinction. All I read is, the mass killing of Arabs is not as bad as the mass killing of Jews. Doesn't matter that they are mass killing Palestinians, starving the whole country, raping women and children, bombing hospitals, using chemical weapons, torturing prisoners. Tell me that the Israelis are not stripping the Palestinians of their dignity and all they are worth. Morally speaking I see no difference.
Even if I were to concede that Nazis were worse than what Israel is doing in Palestine, and that its not a genocide, it does change the fact of the immortality and human rights violalation they are perpetrating because of the Zionist ideology.
You clearly have a bone to pick with anyone with disagrees with Zionism. I'm done.