Selfhosted

63589 readers

690 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

Be civil.
No spam.
Posts are to be related to self-hosting.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.
Submission headline should match the article title.
No trolling.
Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.
AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

curbstickle@anarchist.nexus

curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world

405

British fintech Revolut slashes "AI" coding costs 10x by cutting out Claude and going self-hosted (www.theregister.com)

submitted 1 day ago by technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

56 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Revolut says that in less than a year it's managed to slash its [code generation] costs by roughly 90 percent by making self-hosted models its default instead of relying primarily on commercial services like Claude.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] bumblebeer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When i write a sentence then do i have a copyright upon it which i can defend in law?

Umm... Yes. Yes, you do. That's how copyright works...

The current models are all trained with data which at least some larger creator (book writer or whatever) does not want a model to be trained on.

Is this not antithetical to your stance? Or are you saying that only those entities large enough to defend themselves against the likes of OpenAI and Anthropic are deserving of being paid for use of their works?

The current models are under the current law unsustainable.

I completely agree with you here, but something like a class action lawsuit is not a viable solution.

You understand the scale right? This is a combinatorial problem: the plaintiffs in this case would be every individual and company that has ever existed, and the defendants would be not only the AI companies, but also anyone who has ever used or published AI generated content. That's a wishful thought, not a realistic solution.

[–] ShortN0te@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

that in theory is correct but in practice a sentence or few lines of code don't let me fight for them in court.

Pls dont bother to answer if you do not have a proof that a simple sentence or a simple line of code has any meaning for copyright in the court. And no i dont mean the few sentences that are actually copyrighted since they are catchphrases to specifics. No i mean a general sentence, or line of code.

Try to copyright "i = i + 1". Then we can continue this talk.

[–] bumblebeer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I'm sorry, but it's not my responsibility to educate you about copyright law, even though I have done what I could. I wish you the best. Good day.