this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2026
590 points (97.3% liked)

World News

58938 readers
1541 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world

Ask Historians !askhistorians@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ennof@feddit.org 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I think you do have a point. I think the overarching problem with discussions about "AI" is that people rarely refer to the same things when they talk about it and they end up talking past each other. There is a difference between using a custom harness with (a) carefully optimized local LLM(s) and other models you glue on top yourself for other-than-text tasks and using server-side models with a ready-made CLI and UI served to you on a golden platter with all processing being done elsewhere. "You're gonna get left behind" is not the argument here. If the problem is "the code is too complicated", that is a style issue that can be mitigated. It's not set in stone. Sure, there are many problems with LLMs and ML models in terms of where they source their training data from and the environmental impact of data centers. I've also had my fair share of literal slop pop out. Some problems are just there and won't go away (yet), but some problems are a choice, whether you know it or not.

I also think that some people like the idea of being on the designing end rather than just being on the using end. Why stop at skill.md? Why not post-train your model on your own code, style and preferences? I've trained a tiny model on a small subset of data I may legally use because it's... fun. It's my hobby. I just tinker around with it. The model itself is absolute poop, because it's super small. But it works. I also locally rebuilt llama.cpp with a TheRock ROCm build for better support for my graphics card and got a very significant performance improvement. It doesn't even need to be useful in any meaningful way (it often is anyway), as long as I got fun understanding how it works.

"I'll just start using it one day and be just as good as everyone else because that's explicitly how they are designing the software to be used, right?". Yes. You're still going to need to be capable enough to express what you want with precision, but if you can do that, you're absolutely right, especially considering future models. But maybe you don't want to be absolutely dependent on big companies serving you those models.