this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2026
595 points (98.7% liked)

Memes

17578 readers
1447 users here now

Post memes here.

A meme is an idea, behavior, or style that spreads by means of imitation from person to person within a culture and often carries symbolic meaning representing a particular phenomenon or theme.

An Internet meme or meme, is a cultural item that is spread via the Internet, often through social media platforms. The name is by the concept of memes proposed by Richard Dawkins in 1972. Internet memes can take various forms, such as images, videos, GIFs, and various other viral sensations.


Laittakaa meemejä tänne.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Only because US train system is biased toward freight.

Not complaining, it is what it is.

That said, I don't see any pragmatic way to build passenger high-speed rail across the US. Every state would want it to run for them - otherwise they won't support it. Then every city, etc.

Edit: for straight shots (point-to-point) across vast distances I don't see train ever matching planes (like NY to LA)

[–] XiJinpingStanAccount@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The US rail network is already kind of a disaster. A lot of major cities don't even have passenger rail stations at all. There are entire STATES that don't have a single amtrack station lol.

[–] Slatlun@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Just for clarity, this map doesn't show all Amtrak stations. The cities pictured are just the big ones on the routes

we're planning on taking my MIL on a train from seattle to phoenix and this helps a lot.

[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

It would be most feasible to have like three high speed rails in the US. Up and down both coasts, and then east coast to west coast through the midwest, Denver, SLC etc.

That alone would be enough to replace a ton of car and plane trips, even if it didn’t provide service everywhere

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

We can't even build a single HSR line anywhere in the US

We're a long ways away from being able to even think about trans-continental HSR

We simply do not have the competence to do it

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

NYC to LA is 4000km, so a dead straight non stop rail route operating at the current peak of high speed rail (200mph) would still take 12 hours. As soon as you pick a real route and stops and account for that speed being unrealistically expensive you're looking at over 24h I think.

The annoying thing is that rail infrastructure is also expensive to maintain.

[–] Corn@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

24 hours isn't bad, I took longer sleeper trains in China.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well it's not going to be faster than 6 hour plane though 🤔

[–] Corn@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Either way you're losing a whole day to travel, at least the sleeper train you save on a hotel room.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

The more time I can spend in my house, the better