this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2025
579 points (98.3% liked)

Not The Onion

16613 readers
1098 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RejZoR@lemmy.ml 155 points 17 hours ago (5 children)

Let me get this straight. They are going to outlaw... water condensation. They are literally the grandpa from The Simpsons yelling at the clouds. Because chemtrails are basically just clouds. It's just water vapor from the airplane engines condensing in cold atmosphere at high altitudes. Because it's cold up there. They know it's cold up there, right? Right? Imagine being a grown fucking adult and not knowing how this shit works. Go out in the winter and breathe with open mouth. You're now breathing out chemtrails. you fucking dumbasses.

[–] radix@lemmy.world 51 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 27 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Scientists have shown that those who come in contact with dihydrogen monoxide have a 100% fatality rate. Every single person that has come in contact with it dies.

[–] msage@programming.dev 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

It's like 99.8% fatality ATM.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 1 points 27 minutes ago

There is a latency period. Anyone exposed has been shown to die at a 100% rate.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 15 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

It's in all the food you eat! Big Food lobbies to protect their profits by using it in food production!

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

The real tragedy is the pollution. While there are areas of the world that are generally safe from dihydrogen monoxide in the environment, in my area there are literally rivers of the stuff with regular exposure to the air we breath.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

It's also extremely prevalent in areas of high humidity, further compounding sweaty asscrack syndrome.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 1 points 13 hours ago

Swamp-ass is real - raise awareness!

[–] azimir@lemmy.ml 5 points 15 hours ago

In all major US cities since the 1970's that have a river in the downtown area, the percentage concentration of dihydrogen monoxide has been increasing! We keep finding more and more of it in parts per million in our river water. At what point will someone in our government stand up for us and say this is enough?!?

[–] DrownedRats@lemmy.world 18 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

No no, you see, chemtrails look and behave exactly like contrails. They're entirely, completely, 100% indistinguishable from contrails. So now that theyve banned them, you can be sure that all those trails you see in the sky are pure contrails and you've got your local Republican politician to thank for it!

Its definitely not just that they want an easy win without actually having to do anything, do not look at the man behind the curtain!

[–] saltnotsugar@lemmy.world 13 points 15 hours ago

See the problem is you’re using logic and reason backed up by facts. They need to hear loud buzzwords from talking heads.

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Well technically not just water they also contain some chemicals from the exhaust. Ironically those same people don't mind exhausts from cars or coal power plants.

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago

Airliners don’t burn lead and that some bit of chemicals disperses at 30,000 ft. Bubba McSisterhump in his diesel pavement princess chooching up a giant cloud of black smoke directly in your face…somehow cool and owns the libs

These people are fucking exhausting

[–] Deconceptualist@lemm.ee 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 57 minutes ago) (2 children)

Well if you can see condensed water vapor in open air, it's most likely nucleating around something. And that something is probably the combustion products from the jet fuel. I don't know exactly what each of those thousands of molecular structures are, but burning fuels in general can produce a whole host of compounds including Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) that can be rather carcinogenic. And that pollution most likely settles somewhere on the planet surface eventually.

As takeda said in another comment, it might not be worse than more local sources like cars or trains or power plants, but it's very unlikely to just be water, and probably not healthy.

I'm not saying it's a deliberate spread of chemicals and it's certainly not the mind control nonsense that conspiracy lunatics think. No, most combustion products are just waste with no real use. But calling it "just water" or "harmless clouds" can't be entirely right unless you believe carbon atoms can just disappear.

[–] RejZoR@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

The logic behind chemtrails is that evil governments or the rich Illuminati elite are intentionally spraying specific chemicals to control population. If argument was ecological impact of burning fuel, then we'd have to ban airplanes, not chemtrails. But that's not the argument.

Also it's not water droplets or vapor, it's most likely crystalized water vapor or droplets. Commercial airplanes fly at around 10km above ground and temperatures can get very low, we're talking -40°C. It's literally those videos where someone throws a pot of hot water up in the air outside during cold winter. It instantly turns into a white mist. Hot jet engines, cold atmosphere, burned fuel and vapor during combustion, would you look at that... CHEMTRAILS!

Not to mention weight is incredible luxury metric on airplanes. If conspiracy people think commercial airlines would carry half the fuel on board and replace other half with chemicals for chemtrails, because reasons, yeah, they don't do that. They actually rather not even fill the fuel tanks all the way if it's not necessary for the flight and rather do it when airplane touches at the destination and they refuel it there. Because carrying additional weight consumes more fuel, even if that weight is the fuel itself.

[–] Deconceptualist@lemm.ee 1 points 58 minutes ago

Yep, I understand all that and agree with you. The chemtrail conspiracy people are unhinged.

I'm just criticizing the statement that fossil-fuel vehicles are only emitting water, when we know for a fact that the combustion products are pollutants.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Also all the CO2, clearly we should be banning these flying machines from spreading mass quantities of weather changing chemicals in our atmosphere.

[–] Deconceptualist@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago

We don't have a good alternative to planes so it's probably better to require the industry to offset its pollution. Not than anyone wants flights to be more expensive. But as usual the ultra-wealthy take the most flights yet don't pay as much as they should.