this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2025
286 points (98.6% liked)

Selfhosted

46653 readers
1254 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What’s your go too (secure) method for casting over the internet with a Jellyfin server.

I’m wondering what to use and I’m pretty beginner at this

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] drkt@scribe.disroot.org 10 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

They can try all they like, man. They're not gonna guess a username, key and password.

[–] anzo@programming.dev 1 points 3 hours ago

Only the failed attempts could be a Denial Of Service and throw you out. So, at least add an ever increasing delay to those. Fail2ban is important.

[–] Ptsf@lemmy.world 14 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Doesn't take that to leverage an unknown vulnerability in ssh like:

https://blog.qualys.com/vulnerabilities-threat-research/2024/07/01/regresshion-remote-unauthenticated-code-execution-vulnerability-in-openssh-server

That's why it's common best practice to never expose ssh to raw internet if you can help it; but yes it's not the most risky thing ever either.

[–] drkt@scribe.disroot.org 12 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

If you're going to open something, SSH is far, far more battle-tested than much other software, even popular software. Pragmatically, If someone is sitting on a 0-day for SSH, do you genuinely think they're gonna waste that on you and me? Either they're gonna sell it to cash out as fast as possible, or they'll sit on it while plotting an attack against someone who has real money. It is an unhealthy level of paranoia to suggest that SSH is not secure, or that it's less secure than the hundreds of other solutions to this problem.

Here is my IP address, make me eat my words.
2a05:f6c7:8321::164 | 89.160.150.164

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 4 points 7 hours ago

Are you giving random strangers legal permission to pentest you? That's bold.

[–] pm_me_your_puppies@infosec.pub 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

You got balls to post you public addresses like that... I mean I agree with you wholeheartedly and I also have SSH port forwarded on my firewall, but posting your public IP is next-level confidence.

Respect.

That is some big dick energy ngl

[–] Ptsf@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago

I linked a relevant vulnerability, but even ignoring that, pragmatically, you feel they'd be targeting specific targets instead of just what they currently do? (That, by the way, is automating the compromise of vulnerable clients in mass scale to power botnets). Any service you open on your device to the internet is inherently risky. Ssh best practices are, and have been since the early days, not to expose it to the internet directly.