this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2025
923 points (99.7% liked)

Progressive Politics

2920 readers
1229 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Words matter.

You aren't writing an academic paper. Always use simple direct language.

  • Help the poor
  • Healthcare for everyone
  • Good treatment at work.

Don't use complex words.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago (3 children)

They got me! I have to admit, "welfare" leaves a bad taste in my mouth where "helping the poor" sounds fair enough. I grew up under Reagan, heard the bullshit, know it's bullshit, I get it.

And you know damned well what those words really mean. Welfare = black, poor people = whites. (That's from a GenX perspective.)

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 31 points 1 day ago

Welfare = black, poor people = whites.

Ding ding ding! We have a winner.

[–] dufkm@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So weird. As a Scandinavian, "welfare" to me means schools, healthcare, elderly care, sick pay, paid parental leave etc., paid for by the shared burden of taxes for the benefit of everyone.

It is a word with entirely positive connotations for me.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Our famous and revered constitution actually says in its thesis statement that one of the purposes of our government is to provide for the general welfare

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

To me the negative connotation of "welfare" is, Kafkaesque bureaucracy used to gate access. Actually being on it feels more like you are playing a fucked up game than receiving assistance.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

People acting like gaming welfare is easy. Fuck me, it's a full-time job getting anything at all.

For example: Been thinking about trying to get some food stamps. Wife works, I'm unemployed, maybe get a little of the tax money back from when I was making bank? Maybe get a pittance of unemployment? I can scarcely imagine navigating all the bullshit if I wasn't technically capable. Kafkaesque bureaucracy indeed.

[–] myrrh@ttrpg.network 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

...i've claimed unemployment benefits a couple of times in the past four decades and the administrative burden was onerous-enough to substantially disrupt my liberty to look for work, the release of benefits delayed until i'd already found work the better part of a year later, and the benefits such a token pittance as to be eclipsed by interest on credit i used to make ends meet in the interim...

...i supect their fraud-prevention programs cost more to administer than the actual benefits they're supposedly protecting...

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I got fired from a job, rather unjustly, and attempted to file for unemployment.

It made no sense, I could not navigate my states website (which didn’t want to play well with Linux anyway), so I gave up. Which is the point.

One time an employer fired me and refused to pay me after discovering I was trans, and it literally took 6 months to get that check. The system is designed to fuck people.

[–] Artisian@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

I hear this, and also some flavor of people gaming the system.

I don't like that I hear these things. But something definitely weaseled its way in.