this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2025
376 points (97.7% liked)

Not The Onion

17481 readers
1471 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just give them a phone. Then at least they get something they want with it, instead of ugly shoes.

[–] Fiery@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Young children should absolutely not have a phone, unless I suppose it's completely locked down to chat apps and the tracking I suppose...

[–] KoalaUnknown@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

My little sister has a phone I set up for her. It has no internet browser, requires permission to download apps, no voicemail, blocks unknown callers, and turns off at 9pm with the exception of contacting family or emergency services.

Phones can be safe for kids if parent just put in the time to learn about parental safety systems and implement them.

[–] sykaster@feddit.nl 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

More and more governments issue warning about the effects of screens on baby, toddler, and child brain development. The age the Netherlands puts forward now is 14 to have a smartphone, and no screens or very limited until 3 years of age.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)

How is it different than a TV screen? That was my brainrot when I was growing up.

[–] _ffiresticks_@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They issue is less the screen than it is the lack of long-form entertainment. Kids paying attention to an hour and a half movie plot on the screen isn't the same problem as scrolling through endless 30 second videos or accessing social media.

[–] sykaster@feddit.nl 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The TV is also bad, but smartphones are literally slot machines in the child's pocket that keep giving them dopamine hits. It's many times worse for the brain.

There are parental controls etc. But the nature of the device is addictive with its notifications and the likes.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Individually targeted and psychologically-optimized content.

[–] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

Those happen to be the things a child should not be exposed to

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Learn to use the tools to protect your kids. iPhones and Android can absolutely be locked down for children. Or just get an apple watch or flip phone. All better than a fucking airtag.

My kids got an apple watch, locked down during school hours, etc.

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Better for what purpose? If you’re on holiday in a busy, foreign city, an AirTag for location tracking is much cheaper than this other options.

AirTags rely on being able to piggyback off of other iPhones to report their location. They are not a self-contained device, merely an appliance. If you give your kid a smartwatch with cellular or a full-fledged phone, you can track where they are but also they have the ability to contact you/be contacted if need be. Sure, there are drawbacks to such choices, but that is what being well-informed as a parent is all about.