this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2025
518 points (98.5% liked)

World News

46188 readers
3327 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/59867996

German media outlets Süddeutsche Zeitung, WDR, and NDR also cite the report, noting that Russian President Vladimir Putin appears intent on testing NATO’s Article 5 guarantees. The alliance’s mutual defence clause obliges member states to come to one another’s aid if attacked. The assessment suggests Putin may seek to challenge how seriously that commitment would be honoured.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Teknikal@eviltoast.org -4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (8 children)

A planned attack is still an attack. Waiting is stupid we should hit them with everything now if there's proof.

If I see a local nutter known for stabbing people staring at me with a knife and bragging about he's going to stab me later I'm stabbing him first to protect myself. Same thing imo.

[–] slackassassin@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago (6 children)

You're missing the point. It's not a strategical decision that's being made here.

NATO is a defense treaty, not a warfare alliance. It has specific language describing it as such.

Interestingly enough, you are paroting Kremlin talking points by treating it as anything other than a defensive agreement.

[–] Teknikal@eviltoast.org -5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

Well if I was the country that knew it was being attacked I'd not be waiting for the Russians to build up their equipment. This could be Ww3 if you wait until they're ready or their buddies to arrive.

Might be time to end Nato and make a new alliance that is willing to do what is necessary.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago

Well if I was the country that knew it was being attacked I'd not be waiting for the Russians to build up their equipment.

Given that most of the countries in Europe have been relying heavily on their now-compromised former ally America for security, the smarter move would be to also spend the intervening years building up equipment.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)