this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2025
1379 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

74692 readers
2729 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dremor@lemmy.world 79 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (17 children)

Removable batteries are coming back, as they become mandatory in the EU in 2027.
Or you can already get one with a Fairphone (which also has SD card slot).
As for the headphone jack, I'm afraid it won't come back. Bluetooth alternatives are far better these days (I got both, so I know from experience), and good adapters (like Apple one) are barely more than $10.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 hours ago

So what if Bluetooth are "better"?

Still no reason to not have both.

saying "bluetooth alternatives are far better these days" ignores the uses cases for cable.

[–] tibi@lemmy.world 15 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

No, bluetooth is not better. Bluetooth has latency which is bad for anything that needs realtime audio, like video games or any kind of live performance. It also runs on 2.4 like every other electronic Wireless devices making it prone to interference. And it's yet another device to keep charged all the time.

USB C is also inferior because you need dongles which increase complexity of your setup, it's more prone to failures. Like audio cutting off every x minutes because connection is just slightly loose or other electronic gremlins. I'm saying this having just had a gig and the MD's phone we relied on for the metronome started acting up during the performance not recognizing the dongle until a reboot.

Audio jacks were simple, analog, worked perfectly fine and delivered high quality audio. What we have now is overengineered slop that is less reliable and more expensive.

[–] AndyMFK@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Bluetooth alternatives aren't better, that's laughable.

You cant buy beyerdynamics DT-990s with Bluetooth, you cant get Sennheiser HD 490 Pros with Bluetooth, you cant buy Audeze LCD-5s with Bluetooth. I could go on and on but you get the point. Good headphones don't use Bluetooth.

The nice headphones a lot of us have had for years, well before the headphone jack was removed don't have Bluetooth.

So when you say they're better 1. You're wrong. And 2. You're missing the point.

If you prefer Bluetooth, fine, but phones with headphone jacks still have Bluetooth. You're only ok with it because it doesn't effect you and I think that's appalling.

Imagine phone manufacturers remove the ability to use Bluetooth headphones and I say "that's fine, wired headphones are better anyway". It's not about that, it's about removing your freedom to choose and it should NOT be tolerated

[–] Dremor@lemmy.world -5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There are a lot of very good Bluetooth headphones from Bose, Sony, and the like. If you take a look at lab tests, most of lf them got a frequency response pretty close to the ideal curve, and ANC helps a lot to isolate outside noises that would drown out the music on wired headphones.

But I do agree about choice, just not on the blind refusal of using USB-C adapters. That's unfortunate that they removed it, but it has some good reasons. A headphone jack wasn't made to be waterproof, and if some managed to make some of them waterproof-ish, it is often by enclosing it into its own little sub-enclosure, with a good short-circuit protection (because even a tiny water drop in there mean a short), both of which takes place.
Same goes for the DAC, we got so far into miniaturizing it, and inside interferences are so high now with new technologies, it probably wouldn't be viable anymore to have it inside the phone itself. Even larger device, like the Steam Deck, have problems preventing interferences on the headphones jack, so that must be an even bigger problem on something as tinny as a phone 😅

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 14 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

citing bose and sony vs sennheiser audeze and beyerdynamics, dude, you don't know headphones

[–] Dremor@lemmy.world -5 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

I trust in independent reviews, reproducible tests and hard numbers, not in brand cultivated images and subjective choices. I don't care if it comes for Audeze, Sony, or a Chinese Knockoff, numbers doesn't lie.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

did... did you just call sennheiser a chinese knockoff? dude, know when to bow out

[–] Dremor@lemmy.world 0 points 8 hours ago

Hell no. I'm well aware it is a good audio brand (german I think, but may be mistaken)

What I wanted to say here is that I prefer an objective good quality product, adapted to my needs, to a brand name. Even well known brands sometimes make bad products.

As an example, I have a Sony WH-1000XM3. But if I'd be interested in an XM4, there is no way in hell I'd buy an XM5, because of some shitty choices they took (no more foldable design, forced adaptative ANC). Maybe the XM6 will end up of interest to me, I did not yet check its specs, but considering I recently changed my current XM3 battery, I won't be back on the market until the XM7 or XM8.

[–] xep@discuss.online 5 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Could you show us the frequency response for the Bose vs the LCD-5s and tell us why you prefer the Bose?

[–] Archr@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You are right. But for >99% of users Bluetooth is a perfectly sufficient connection format for headphones.

[–] RheumatoidArthritis@mander.xyz 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I work in IT and pairing bluetooth is sometimes so finnicky i give up for a few days. I can accept that I'm not that great at IT but I don't think 99% of people don't have these problems.

And it's not a thing you do one time, most of these gadgets need re-pairing every sone time for whatever reason.

[–] Archr@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Oh I'll agree that sometimes Bluetooth pairing can be finicky.

But the person I replied to was talking about how Bluetooth is not good enough for audiophile quality headphones. But most people don't care and can't even notice the difference.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 115 points 1 day ago (11 children)

Bluetooth alternatives are far better these days

Disputable.

  • they are cable-less, thus need to be charged separately
  • they are cable-less, thus it is easier to lose them
  • bluetooth implementation is a potential security vulnerability
  • transmission by radio will always be less energy efficient than transmission by wire
[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 11 points 14 hours ago

Missed a few things.

  • They are cable-less, thus they use a battery and have a shorter lifespan
  • The batteries they use are generally not user replaceable do they turn into e-waste rather quickly
  • Due to the reduced bluetooth bandwidth, call quality is crap
  • Sound quality is worse than a wired headphone that costs the same
[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 78 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I liked the whole not having to charge headphones thing more than anything.

[–] tomiant@programming.dev 14 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

I liked being able to accidentally brush up against my headphones or putting them down for a moment without them turning off my music.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

i'm a musician, have a trained ear and even with mild tinnitus have yet to see any BT audio transmission that matches the fidelity of cables.

That aspect did pop into my head but I am not qualified to comment as I never use any wireless headsets, nor are my ears trained enough for fully appreciating hi-fi quality.

BT 6.1 introduced Randomized RPA (Resolvable Private Address) which should help with some of the security issues. That said I wouldn’t expect to see headphones implementing 6.1 for quite some time. It just came out in May.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

they are cable-less, thus need to be charged separately

Not a major drawback, IMO.

they are cable-less, thus it is easier to lose them

True, but I haven't lost any in the something like 6 years I've been using them.

bluetooth implementation is a potential security vulnerability

What's your threat model? Who's going to be attacking your security via your headphones? What happens if they succeed?

IMO this is a pretty ridiculous drawback, it's like saying "wired headphones are worse because the wire can be used as a garrote", which is true, but not an actual drawback for 99.999% of people.

transmission by radio will always be less energy efficient than transmission by wire

So what?

IMO the drawbacks of wired headphones are:

  • The cable often gets tangled, and it's a pain in the ass to untangle it
  • The cable can often get snagged on things, and if that happens the best thing that can happen is that the headphones can go flying out of your ears. The worst thing that can happen is that the phone goes flying out of your pocket and smashes on the ground.
  • The cables can get dirty and frayed, and if they get too frayed they can break or get worn down so they have an iffy connection.
  • Even when the cable isn't tangled, just arranging the wire so it's out of the way, long enough to get to your ears, but not so long it gets tangled can be frustrating.
  • Trying to use your phone for anything else while your headphones are attached can be a problem. Say you want to take a picture of something, or pay for something using NFC, you have to be careful of the cable. If you had the cable tucked into your shirt or zipped up in your jacket so it's out of the way, now the cable might not be long enough anymore.
  • Because of the wire, you're limited in where you can put your phone, and your head has to always be within a short distance to your phone. With a wireless headset you can choose to put the phone in a knapsack if that's more convenient, and when you put down the knapsack you can take a few steps away from it without losing your connection and interrupting whatever you're listening to.
  • If you're doing something like working in the kitchen while listening to music or a podcast, you can't put your phone down on the counter and use it to look at a recipe, because as soon as you have to move to go get another ingredient, or to move from the cutting board to the sink, you have to pick the phone up again. And that can be a real issue if you have goop on your hands and you're moving to the sink to wash them off.
  • In cold weather / winter you might want to have your phone in a jacket or something. If you go inside and take the jacket off you either have to pause things while you transfer the phone to another pocket and rearrange the wire, or you have to do this complicated dance where you clear the wire and move the phone without accidentally yanking the wire out of the phone or out of your ears. With a wireless headset you just take the phone and move it to a new pocket whenever that's convenient.
  • ~~The headphone wire is a potential personal security vulnerability as a ninja can use it to garrote you.~~

The drawbacks for a wireless headset are:

  • They tend to have batteries that can't be replaced, so eventually they lose their ability to hold a charge and need to be replaced. It can get really annoying to use them when the batteries are starting to fail and they hold less than an hour of charge.
  • They tend to be much more expensive than wired headphones.
  • Wireless buds are easier to lose, and easier to drop. If you drop them they can bounce and roll under things, or into the street or who knows where.
  • They do eventually run out of charge, and you do have to charge them, and sometimes they can be low on charge / out of charge when you want to use them.
  • There's a fair amount of lag, which can be annoying when you're trying to skip commercials on podcasts and so-on.
[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

First of all, you're forgetting that the actual problem is that the headphone jack does not require you remove bluetooth from the device. The issue here is giving user less options and more costly "solutions".

The cable often gets tangled, and it's a pain in the ass to untangle it

Git gud. It's not that hard to roll up the cable so that it doesn't tangle. Worst case scenario, you can buy a small case.

The cable can often get snagged on things, and if that happens the best thing that can happen is that the headphones can go flying out of your ears. The worst thing that can happen is that the phone goes flying out of your pocket and smashes on the ground.

Run the cable through your shirt. Problem solved.

The cables can get dirty and frayed, and if they get too frayed they can break or get worn down so they have an iffy connection.

Use headphones with a replaceable wire. That way you can use a cable with or without a mic or use different lentghs. Hell, you can even make your own and they're cheap. Even if the wire isn't easily replaceable, most headphones can be fixed with a bit of patience and a soldering iron.

Even when the cable isn't tangled, just arranging the wire so it's out of the way, long enough to get to your ears, but not so long it gets tangled can be frustrating.

You're just doing mental gymnastics at this point.

Trying to use your phone for anything else while your headphones are attached can be a problem. Say you want to take a picture of something, or pay for something using NFC, you have to be careful of the cable. If you had the cable tucked into your shirt or zipped up in your jacket so it's out of the way, now the cable might not be long enough anymore.

Or you can, I don't know, unplug the headphones for 2 seconds.

Because of the wire, you're limited in where you can put your phone, and your head has to always be within a short distance to your phone. With a wireless headset you can choose to put the phone in a knapsack if that's more convenient, and when you put down the knapsack you can take a few steps away from it without losing your connection and interrupting whatever you're listening to.

Redundant. Also, put your phone in your pocket and stop whinin'.

If you're doing something like working in the kitchen while listening to music or a podcast, you can't put your phone down on the counter and use it to look at a recipe, because as soon as you have to move to go get another ingredient, or to move from the cutting board to the sink, you have to pick the phone up again. And that can be a real issue if you have goop on your hands and you're moving to the sink to wash them off.

My man, are you allergic to speakers? You're cooking in a kitchen. Lose the headphones.

In cold weather / winter you might want to have your phone in a jacket or something. If you go inside and take the jacket off you either have to pause things while you transfer the phone to another pocket and rearrange the wire, or you have to do this complicated dance where you clear the wire and move the phone without accidentally yanking the wire out of the phone or out of your ears. With a wireless headset you just take the phone and move it to a new pocket whenever that's convenient.

Skill issue. Run your wire underneath your jacket and you won't have this """problem""".

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works -1 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Run the cable through your shirt. Problem solved.

New problem created. Now when you want to take your phone out of your pocket to take a picture of something or scan it for an NFT sale you can't do that easily because you have this wire running through your shirt connecting your phone to your headphones. Also, if it's winter, now your phone has to go in an inner pocket not an outer one so you can't easily access it anymore.

Or you can, I don't know, unplug the headphones for 2 seconds.

And start blasting whatever you're listening to to the whole world? Well, you could pause what you're listening to first. Don't you see how this is much less convenient than wireless headphones where you don't have to make all these compromises?

Redundant. Also, put your phone in your pocket and stop whinin'.

Ah, accept a less convenient alternative because of the limitations of the wires. Sure, sounds great.

My man, are you allergic to speakers? You're cooking in a kitchen.

You're cooking in a kitchen. There are loud fans, loud kettles. Why would you use a speaker that you have to turn way up to blast over all that noise? What's wrong with you. Use headphones, you're in a kitchen!

Skill issue. Run your wire underneath your jacket and you won't have this """problem""".

Now you have the other problems with your phone being inside an inner pocket and not easily accessible for doing things like taking pictures or doing NFT transactions. You really haven't thought this through, have you?

[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

You're like one of those people from infomercials who is unrealistically bad at simple low-skill activities

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

And you're like that farmer with his ass, glaring at all the newfangled technology, convinced it must be useless because you can't understand it.

[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Lol nah you're just butthurt, get over it

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 33 minutes ago

You sure wish those kids would get off your lawn.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Great arguments! ~/s~

Still no reason to not just have both options.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

Well, the reason not to have both options if you're a phone manufacturer is that pesky port. Every port is a headache for them. There structural weak points, they're places that can get dust and dirt in them, etc. As a user, I want as many options as possible, but if I can get a phone that's $100 cheaper because it doesn't have a headphone port, I'll definitely choose that option.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I have two devices, one is my phone, and one only plays music. I only ever use my phone as my phone, and my music device as my music device in my car, and both run over Bluetooth.

It is a crapshoot as to which role my car will assign to which device. Sometimes I have to put my phone in airplane mode so that the car won't try to assign it the media player role in Bluetooth settings. I'm not impressed.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

check the Bluetooth settings on your phone. on mine, I can disallow roles that a peripheral could get, like media audio, phone calls, etc

[–] Patches@ttrpg.network 5 points 1 day ago

That has a lot more to do with the car itself.

If you ever want to talk about a shit OS...

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 21 hours ago

I never had one of my wired earbuds fall off the platform at the train station and disappear in the gravel, nor did I ever have isues with forgetting to charge them, let alone their case being brolen and not charging at all. And if I want to switch my favourite headphones over from my PC to my phone, I'm really glad my old phone still has a jack.

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Hmmm. Then I would need to figure out how my authenticators would work. I have like 3 different ones for a total of like 18 accounts. It's annoying as all hell

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

2026 will be the year of the Linux phone!

or 2027. Or some Chinese variant of android on Chinese/Taiwan phone that allows sideloading, perhaps with alternate playstore and maps. I don't yet understand how draconian this actually gets implemented, but death of android/google (to me) is possible. If hardware is good enough, then android emulator will be fine for legacy apps.

[–] foggenbooty@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'd love for that to be the case, but without a lot more polish and the ability to run Android apps in some kind of sandbox I don't see it happening.

[–] dil@lemmy.zip 5 points 19 hours ago

need more ppl to adopt it while its shitty for that point to ever come

Bluetooth is better than...it used to be? Because I promise you there is no earbud on planet earth better than my open back cans.

[–] Kuranashi@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

I still have a headphone jack. Rare but Androids with them exist if you go out of the mainstream bullshit.

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

They won’t become “removable” like in ye old Nokia days. It’s not like you can carry extra batteries and just swap them on the go.

They just have to be swappable without special tools or specialist equipment.

[–] int32@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago

I have a fp4 and it is VERY annoying to not have jack(I don't wanna use bluetooth because jack works, doesn't need a battery and is low tech), so now I only listen to music on my computer, but I'm planning on making an mp3 player with a raspberry pi pico.

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Fairphone is too big, i don't want a phablet in my pocket

load more comments (5 replies)