this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2025
149 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

75630 readers
2356 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

This just sounds like a regular bank transfer to another European bank...input recipient in your self-service online banking and press "transfer"...beep boop done.

What does this "digital" euro do that the existing euro (which is also perfectly working in digital space) solve?

[–] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Late response, but anyways: the big advantage over regular bank transfers is you can use it like a virtual card without Visa or Mastercard. In essence, the biggest draw is pushing US companies out of the EU financial system.

[–] just_an_average_joe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] Marvie@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

For real, isn’t this allowing them to have much more control over what you have in the bank? Preventing bank runs as they call it(aka blocking withdrawals)

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There will be the exact same level of surveillance, it's still just run by banks so there's no difference there.

[–] Schlemmy@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago

Not really. I was scammed for a few hundreds of euro's last year. I knew the company, I knew the account but the bank was incapable of reacting because of 'reasons'. They know where the money went but they can't follow where it got transferred to. So they can only follow one transaction and after that it's gone. (Except when you get a court order)

[–] Meron35@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

The existing Euro does not have a proper system for day to day transactions. Transfers are currently handled by SEPA, which are only suitable for things like bills. This means that a lot of people especially in less developed EU nations end up using an international bank card, i.e. MasterCard/Visa for day to day transactions.

Details are somewhat vague, but the ECB's website seems to have many good assurances. This even includes strong privacy features, such as offline capabilities and cash-like privacy.

FAQs on a digital euro - https://www.ecb.europa.eu/euro/digital_euro/faqs/html/ecb.faq_digital_euro.en.html#q1

[–] Schlemmy@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago

A regular transfer takes at least some hours/days. With digital currency the transfer is instant.

Apart from that, surveillance. There's a (de)centralized register that shows how much money there is ti be found on any account at any given time.

[–] divingdonkey@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The digital euro will be centralized on the European Central Bank, so the transactions do not depend on some local banks. It's in direct competition with the banks themselves. But yeah, not that big a difference for the end user imho

[–] exu@feditown.com 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

But a central bank shouldn't be in competition with its customers, the other banks. That's massively stupid

[–] divingdonkey@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

It is. That's why banks have publicly backed Wero in favor of the digital euro. It might also be a reason for the relatively low limits of the digital euro wallets, but that's just my speculation.

[–] a4ng3l@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Well honestly I’m not quite sure I would not welcome the removal of some of the influence the banking sector has on us all. It is very predatory in nature all the lending and such. Additionally money is a limited resource so it is maybe not the worse thing to « nationalise »