this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2025
862 points (97.1% liked)

World News

50162 readers
3003 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Epistemic hygiene doesn’t require you to believe only things that are “absolutely true,” since that would exclude literally all empirical claims.

It does require you to proportion your beliefs to the evidence. Big claims require a lot of evidence. The idea that Epstein didn’t kill himself enjoys some degree of confidence (say, 75%) because of circumstantial evidence (not to mention motive and opportunity).

[–] knowone@slrpnk.net -2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Ok so...how have I said anything that goes against that? I've not once said I believe it or that others should and that we should have solid evidence before we believe something. I like the throwing out philosophy terms you're doing in order to try and talk down to me too

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (2 children)

I wouldn’t be surprised if penguins ate the pope. However, I wouldn’t bring up the possibility that penguins have eaten the pope every time he gets mentioned (absent evidence).

[–] knowone@slrpnk.net 0 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Nice editing and erasing most of what you said in this comment. Realised you've been talking shit eh?

[–] knowone@slrpnk.net -2 points 10 hours ago

Didn't realise "plausible" was a synonym for ”true". Do you wanna stop strawmanning me or? And you are doing it to try and talk down to me, be real. You can be "precise" without using those terms. It has similar energy as someone weaponising psychology terms in a conflict in order to try and seem like the one in the right by virtue of being "more intelligent"