this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2025
259 points (71.5% liked)

Technology

75963 readers
3274 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
259
EU Chat Control didnt pass - proving the media got to alot of you (www.patrick-breyer.de)
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by themurphy@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.world
87 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Chat Control didnt pass - they didnt even vote because they were afraid the result would be embarassing.

And we got told so many times, that EU now wants Chat Control. But it was a big fat lie.

EU is a democracy with different opinions, and when a small group of facists tries to read your chats, it does not represent the EU opinion.

But the whole media got you thinking so. Proving even on Lemmy, you and me are extremly prone to propaganda.

I quoted the article here with the news:

In a major breakthrough for the digital rights movement, the German government has refused to back the EU’s controversial Chat Control regulation yesterday after facing massive public pressure.

The government did not take a position on the proposal.

This blocks the required majority in the EU Council, derailing the plan to pass the surveillance law next week.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] artyom@piefed.social 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

it wasn't "close to passing", it was "close to being passed on as a proposal for a law", requiring then a formal vote, no?

It's the same thing. Why would a country show support for the legislation and then vote against it later?

I read it as: "don't believe those who panicke

This is such a charitable reading that it's probably fair to assume this is OPs alt account.

[–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -3 points 15 hours ago

It’s the same thing.

It absolutely is not. I don't know, maybe you're more familiar with the US federal system (pre-Trump, because that's a different can of worms)? If so: imagine if the president (in this case having no ability to issue executive orders, mind you) says "we should do X". That's all well and good, but the X must still go through the Senate and Congress, where it might fail.

Why would a country show support for the legislation and then vote against it later?

Well, because "a country" is not a singular hive-mind, is it? The government says "yes", but their own Parliament might say "no".

Governments have no say in what goes on in the EU Commission or Parliament. I mean, sure, most of the time the MEPs coming out of the government-aligned parties will have similar votes, but the EU elections aren't in-step with most countries' elections, so it's never a 1:1 translation. And even then, many MEPs will just vote on their own.

This is such a charitable reading that it’s probably fair to assume this is OPs alt account.

Holy fuck, watch out when opening the fridge, mate, OP might jump out of it!