this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2025
109 points (95.0% liked)

GenZedong

5133 readers
117 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

See this GitHub page for a collection of sources about socialism, imperialism, and other relevant topics.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KrasnaiaZvezda@lemmygrad.ml -4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I don't really see any diference...

[–] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 22 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Vietnam war had conscripts. Very big difference.

[–] KrasnaiaZvezda@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

All I see is people going half way around the globe to kill children for their own material benefits.

The day that they turn their guns back at their masters will talk.

[–] ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I promise you that conscripted privates were not benefiting materially in any way except through the indirect profiteering of the US by means of imperial acquisition.

The federal poverty line for an individual in 1976 was 1,375 dollars a year.

A private with less then 2 years active duty, or the standard conscription length, made 83.20 a month, or 998.40 dollars a year. Pre-tax.

That’s not exactly swimming in cash, which contributed immensely to the plummeting of conscript moral by the 70s.

[–] vaguevoid@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

they could’ve chosen to dodge the draft

[–] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 8 points 4 months ago

Look I ain't defending them and yes they should have but it is still a difference

[–] ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Poor proletarian workers, especially minorities, did not have the resources to either run away to Canada, or the ability to subject their families to financial ruin by serving time in prison or leaving them behind.

The people who were dodging the draft were college educated labour aristocrats who had enough money themselves or from their families to keep their heads down in Canada until the draft blew over.

Should they have served time in prison or dodged the draft? Morally, absolutely. Materially? That’s where the idealism falls apart.

[–] Darkcommie@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

“You don’t understand the poor proletariat just had to kill Vietnamese farmers” let’s pretend this is true even so the vast majority of vets were volunteers

Keep malding radlib

[–] LadyCajAsca@hexbear.net 16 points 4 months ago (2 children)

hey at least they acted ashamed before lol

[–] Saymaz@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 4 months ago
[–] Darkcommie@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Did any of these Vietnam veterans Change their tune after the war? Asking out of genuine curiosity

[–] Maeve1@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 4 months ago

Yes, a good many. This is a puritan follow the rules society. Acting out has mostly still been within certain lines. There's a difference between individualism and independent thinking, the latter is much more dangerous, socially and literally.