this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2025
109 points (84.3% liked)

World News

50459 readers
2121 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Juice@midwest.social 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Sending that much money to a two year old doesn't make sense. They literally have no concept of money or social responsibility. Why send money when the kid clearly needs a Dr.

/s

Charity from billionaires always looks so fake. Just send it anonymously. Otherwise its just a publicity stunt.

If her entire fortune was $100000 she would have given $6.25. A handful of pocket change and a fiver. Yet I don't get articles by the independent written about me when I give an unhoused veteran a $20

I'm glad that someone in her position did less than the absolute bare minimum to help that child's family. What a moving gesture.

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 10 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

I agree with you except if I was a super fan of the rich person sending money.

If Sigourney Weaver or Gillian Anderson want to pay for my CPAP machine, I’d like to know if they’ll also autograph it.

[–] Juice@midwest.social 6 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

Sigourney and Gillian aren't billionaire capitalists, they're wealthy because they're talented actresses. Their talent makes the owners of production companies lots of money, and they're paid a fraction of it. But they still have to find someone to buy their labor. They had to audition to get jobs before they were big stars.

TS's dad bought a record label and signed her to it.

Class analysis can be tricky, especially the entertainment industry, but it isnt always about being rich or not. The surest way to tell is "what is the relationship to production?" Tay is a billionaire because she helped ticketmaster and Live Nation create a monopoly, she's a parasite. Without Gillian and Sigourney, the movies and shows they worked in wouldn't be as good.

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 2 points 10 hours ago

For sure. You’re totally right. I just mean little girls freaking love TS (whether she earned it or not). If she paid for their treatment I know they’d wanna know.

(I realize this is a 2 yr old, I’m just speaking generally)

[–] SippyCup@lemmy.ml 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

There are no billionaires without exploitation.

[–] Juice@midwest.social 3 points 13 hours ago

1000%

But exploitation is about human freedom. Getting rid of billionaires doesn't end exploitation. It's just a beginning.

The struggle for human freedom will never end

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I’d like to know if they’ll also autograph it, try it on, sleep over for the night.

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 3 points 10 hours ago

You get me. (☞゚ヮ゚)☞

[–] ReiRose@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Yeah the article said she did it quietly. If that were true we wouldn't know about it. You're right: publicity stunt