A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
"Billionaire gives pocket change in a PR stunt". Is the proper title.
"Crowd-funded health care is the best American health-care strategy, according to a Fox News/Heritage Foundation funded study."
While they applaud cutting all NIH research.
Sending that much money to a two year old doesn't make sense. They literally have no concept of money or social responsibility. Why send money when the kid clearly needs a Dr.
/s
Charity from billionaires always looks so fake. Just send it anonymously. Otherwise its just a publicity stunt.
If her entire fortune was $100000 she would have given $6.25. A handful of pocket change and a fiver. Yet I don't get articles by the independent written about me when I give an unhoused veteran a $20
I'm glad that someone in her position did less than the absolute bare minimum to help that child's family. What a moving gesture.
I agree with you except if I was a super fan of the rich person sending money.
If Sigourney Weaver or Gillian Anderson want to pay for my CPAP machine, I’d like to know if they’ll also autograph it.
Sigourney and Gillian aren't billionaire capitalists, they're wealthy because they're talented actresses. Their talent makes the owners of production companies lots of money, and they're paid a fraction of it. But they still have to find someone to buy their labor. They had to audition to get jobs before they were big stars.
TS's dad bought a record label and signed her to it.
Class analysis can be tricky, especially the entertainment industry, but it isnt always about being rich or not. The surest way to tell is "what is the relationship to production?" Tay is a billionaire because she helped ticketmaster and Live Nation create a monopoly, she's a parasite. Without Gillian and Sigourney, the movies and shows they worked in wouldn't be as good.
For sure. You’re totally right. I just mean little girls freaking love TS (whether she earned it or not). If she paid for their treatment I know they’d wanna know.
(I realize this is a 2 yr old, I’m just speaking generally)
There are no billionaires without exploitation.
1000%
But exploitation is about human freedom. Getting rid of billionaires doesn't end exploitation. It's just a beginning.
The struggle for human freedom will never end
I’d like to know if they’ll also autograph it, try it on, sleep over for the night.
You get me. (☞ﾟヮﾟ)☞
Yeah the article said she did it quietly. If that were true we wouldn't know about it. You're right: publicity stunt
"A child who's medical care would be completely free in every other developed nation, and a few underdeveloped ones too receives pocket change from a billionaire so that she doesn't die under the crushing weight of the American medical system" just does not have the same ring to it for article headlines you know? We gotta get the current youth hyperfixation's name in the headline for clicks, because we literally only exist to serve ads.
If billionaires paid more taxes we could all get healthcare
If billionaires paid more taxes we could all get healthcare
And if we had representatives that would vote to use that money for healthcare instead of using it on the military or a new ball room and instead line their pockets with lobbyist ~~bribes~~ donations.
Don't yall already spend more per capita for health care than the developed nations? I'm not saying don't tax the fuck outta billionaires, but the USA should already have a single payer Healthcare system
Yup. Muricans pay 14k$ per capita while the rest of the developed world pays 5-8k$ per capita.
We're both self defeating and stupid. Also, we don't feel that our nation should work to our benefit. It's really a long term 1D chess strat to die early because our nation is a hellhole of our own devising.
Oh, but we also are basically poor while we do it. We're #1! {According to us}
Yes we should but some people would make less money that way, can't have that
She's a billionaire, so for comparison, this is akin to someone who's net worth is 100k, donating 10 Eur. Hardly something worth writing puff articles about.
She's worth 1.6 billion so its actually less
Meanwhile, in other countries, two year olds don’t need the permission of billionaires to survive.
If she really cared, she would have donated dark and not had a puff piece written about it.
She could do so much good but instead she does this for the glam and fame. I don't care what anyone says, all billionaires are bad. There's no good billionaire.
singer quietly donated the sum to the two-year-old girl...
Yeah quietly enough so articles are written about it
Still don't care that a billionaire is doing "charitable works". It's wrong that anyone has to depend on the graces of the wealthy to notice a go fund me to afford healthcare.
Donating that same money to cancer research will save dozens if not hundreds of less photogenic lives, young and old.
100k, in the US, that is gone after a few copays.