BlueMAGA
this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2025
409 points (70.4% liked)
Memes
53534 readers
942 users here now
Rules:
- Be civil and nice.
- Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Kinda crazy how democrats now are just like: "Yeah, I eat a plate of shit. I don't like it, but they told me that was the only option. So I did it, I'm proud of it, and anyone else should be ashamed to not be eating shit like me."
It's kind of funny, that democrats would rather eat bug infested cereals over a shit sandwich, when they could also push for cereals to be actually clean.
Tells you a lot about those people.
If you make me eat shit or cockroaches, I'd rather leave, thanks.
And they're only pretending that they don't like the taste.
Nah it is more like. We all have been eating shit but majority thought it is steak. Lets all eat super mega shit so that majority will start to recognize.
not everyone wants to me a Marxist
Both are shit sandwiches. Trying to use analogy to obfuscate willing participation in genocide, perpetuation of imperialism, brutalization of immigrants, etc doesn't actually erase material reality.
Organize.
Libs are almost pathologically reliant on analogies even in the simplest of scenarios because talking about things as they really are is often indefensible and would necessitate saying the most ghoulish and monstrous shit
Yep, it's all smoke and mirrors.
Yup, they’re both the same thing, as long as you ignore the evidence of your eyes, ears and heart.
Jesus Christ it’s like you’ve never hear the expression that the perfect is the enemy of the good.
It's almost like 2 genocidal fascists can't be considered "good" to begin with.
It’s almost like ignoring everything about a person except 1 aspect of them makes you too ignorant to talk about it.
Go back to Reddit where your lack of critical thinking skills will help you fit in.
I'm not ignoring everything except one aspect, though. Both are genocidal, and both serve the interests of the US Empire above all-else, and as such they share far more in common than not. I'm not ignorant, and you can take your faux-superiority back. I've been here far longer than you have, telling me to go back to Reddit doesn't make any sense. I'm a communist, the devs are communists, and a lot of communists are on Lemmy after various subreddits like r/GenZedong, r/TheDeprogram, and r/ChapoTrapHouse got banned. What I say fits in here.
Hardly. Democrats made it clear that they care about netanyahu's political career above all else.
The purpose of supporting Israel is so that it secures US interests in the region.
That's the excuse. The US' interests would be better served if netanyahu's corruption trial had proceeded.
It isn't the excuse at all, the US has unwavering support for Israel because it's essentially a giant US millitary base in the middle east.
Would netanyahu have really stopped letting the US use their stolen land if biden hadn't been his personal lapdog?
Netanyahu doesn't have the actual power in the US-Israel relationship. Israel is thoroughly dependent on the US, while there's some counter-influence the real seat of power is the US Empire. If Israel becomes more costly to support financially, such as the incredibly high shipping costs due to Yemen's attacks on shipping, as well as an exodus of settlers to keep the project going, only then will Israel lose support and thus collapse.
I know. It's why I'm so pissed off at biden and harris. Their hands weren't forced. They supported genocide willingly.
Absolutely.
I’m not pretending America is the best country, or Harris would be the best for the world.
I have 0 interest in Defending her, but claiming they’re the same with a straight face is fucking laughable. America would be a better country internally and on the global stage with her in charge, by any metric that isn’t “burn all capitalism down”.
Here’s an easy one - would Harris have sent a citizen to CECOT without a trial? Obviously not, because she’s demonstrably different from Trump, like any 3 year old could determine.
The US Empire is the world's worst country. It's the biggest exporter of genocide and terror, and the world's biggest plunderer. Harris would maintain that exact same brutal system, domestically and internationally. It's not hard to be better than them. Yes, Harris would send people to CECOT without trial, every imperialist president has done acts like that.
Chill out with the calling everyone to your left a child or a Russian bot, etc. It's the peak of liberalism.
I admitted nothing of the sort, I'm a communist and I do org work in real life. You've lashed out at people online for not agreeing with you.
She sent a transwoman to mens prison, who got raped and joked about it.
You're pathetically trying to defend this evil ghoul:
Under her jurisdiction, in "progressive" San Francisco, 56% of all inmates in SF jails were black, along with 40% of all arrests (Only 5.8% of the population is black). Ignores police brutality, protected 14 of her officers who were caught sending extremely racist text messages. Oversaw San Francisco’s felony conviction rate rising from 52% to 67% in only 3 years.
And as cherry on the cake fully complicit in a horrible genocide, and you want to claim she would hypothetically be better in the future? LOL
You really disgust me. You are not better but worse.
It's the hypocrisy that bothers me most, at least one side has the balls to say they're fascists.
Unlike you cowardly worms pretending to be good while being absolute scum.
Hope you all get slow cancer.
No one's buying that democrats are "the good" anymore. They're not even "the adequate."
The fact that there's no discernible difference between the parties (or, worse, that Trump rhetorically can outflank Dems from the popular left) should cause Democrats to soul-search and come back with a better political strategy. Instead, we just get this dogmatic insistence that Liz Cheney and Michael Bloomberg are better options than Donald Trump, so you have to go pound pavement in the 100° weather knocking doors, begging friends and neighbors over the phone, and dipping into your kids' college funds to "donate till it hurts" in an effort to get them elected.
It clearly is not. That's the fucking problem. Telling people "go eat dogshit because its tastier than horseshit" and then bitching when your shit stand can't break even is the root of the problem.
Time and time and time again, liberal Democrats run away from the popular candidates in favor of the candidates that can raise the most money. Time and time and time again, these candidates lose to Republicans who are raising money from the exact same evil assholes.
And when we finally fucking see a populist start winning in a bright blue city like NYC, you get the liberal media leadership saying this shit on national television.
It's Birtherism all over again.
Obviously they're different. One's got a big "D" next to her name and climbed into her California Senate seat through Jerry Brown's bed sheets. The other one was a billionaire mega-donor to Hillary Clinton's Senatorial and Presidential Primary campaigns, and hung out with her husband on trips down to Epstein Island. Also he became a Republican a few weeks after Obama won the Presidency.
What you're doing is called "Denialism". You don't want to accept that Donald Trump was a staunch friend, financial supporter, and NYC powerbroker working on behalf of the Democratic Party for decades. So instead of facing this reality and what it means about the state of the party, you're going to cover your ears and pretend it didn't happen.
As she seemed intent on continuing the policies of the prior administrations, the answer is clearly "Yes". We had gestapo doing their dirty work all through the American Southwest going back to the Polk Administration. Bush created ICE, Obama expanded ICE, Trump expanded ICE, Biden expanded ICE, and Kamala Harris campaigned on a platform of anti-immigration that would require her to expand ICE.
Would we have goons like Steven Miller and Curtis Yarvin ranting about unitary executives and divine right of kings under a Harris Administration? Absolutely. Would they be operating in friendly Republican gubernatorial cabinets and think tanks and Congressional offices? Absolutely. Would they be setting national policy through the courts and the legislature and red state executive offices? Absolutely. If Republicans still commanded Congress, would they be authoring national policy that President Harris eventually signed into law? Abso-fucking-lutely.
Would Larry Ellison and Bob Iger and Satya Nadella be kicking back tens of millions of dollars to Republican allies via "settlements"? Would Citadel and JP Morgan be bribing politicians with large purchases of shitcoins to get around campaign contribution limits and other anti-corruption laws? 100% guaranteed. They were doing this shit before Trump took office. Why would they stop now?
Your problem isn't that these fascist policies exist. Your problem is that they've breached "containment" in Red States. Now it's not just a Texas problem or a Florida problem. Its an Everybody problem. You can't just ignore the fascism anymore. You can't say "Those fuckers down south are getting what they deserve".
Now you're down in the shit here with the rest of us. Welcome to hell, asshole.
Brother, you've got a worse case of brain worms than some Kennedys I could name.
Racism and dehumanization of those you disagree with? From a .world account? I'm astonished. /s
Look behind you dude it's the Russians 😨 they're coming to give you factual information run before you die
You're not "forced" to do anything.
There are 3rd parties as always. You can find reasons and excuses not to vote for them but that's all on you.
Glad you ended up with Trump.
Fascists and fascist-lite voters deserve it.
The problem here is structural. For president especially a 3rd party candidate is nothing more than a spoiler. It’s less so if they can win for the house or senate. I would whole heartedly agree with you if the Us had a parliamentary or ranked choice. But we don’t and until we do; with the demo crates it’s a slightly more likely, then just vote for the least fascist that has a chance to win. Use your 3rd party vote in the primaries.
The US Empire will never pass ranked choice voting in a manner that allows for systemic change. The point of the political system is to perpetuate the economic system, and fixing the problems with society requires advancing to socialism and leaving capitalism behind.
And there we go with the excuses.
In non-banana republics with a normal political landscape and populations with spines there have been parties and candidates scoring 1-2 percent, then 10, then 60. Or the other way.
That's how elections work, and nobody of those initial 1-2% voters gave up.
Since outside the US, nobody propagates that defeatist BS.
But OC, this election is “the most important election in history and in our lifetime” so now is not the time to rdo such crazy things as not vote for a duopoly you supposedly don't like but have since the beginning of your miserable country.
You have only yourself to blame and deserve zero sympathy.
On the contrary.
You're like an arsonist that constantly burns houses and now cries because he managed to set his own home on fire.
Well burn baby burn.
What a juvenile take that doesn’t take into account reality at all. From Reddit are you? Go back.
right simpleton.
Go back to your interpretative dance with kibbutz Bernie
Democrats needed to do more to differentiate themselves. But they're still stuck in 1992 and think that if they just triangulate with fascists and treat their own base as hostages, that they're entitled to victory.