this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2025
102 points (89.8% liked)
Progressive Politics
3585 readers
283 users here now
Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)
(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I don't agree. I like this paragraph from the article which captures my sentiment (the last sentence in particular):
Union leadership made a political choice, and it's reasonable to hold them accountable for that. This isn't about blaming the unions for the choices made by scummy democrats, but rather a related but distinct beef with the union. Even if the unions choosing to pressure the Republicans instead would have had no bearing on the outcome in this particular situation, their choice doesn't bode well for future issues where the unions' support (or lack thereof) may prove pivotal.
Here, the union showed that it was willing to sacrifice the long term wellbeing of their members for alleviating the short term harms. That makes me question the effectiveness of a union at all. After all, most successful strikes involve the union helping to cohere workers into an organising force, absorbing some (but not all) of the short term harms of striking. If we can't trust them to fight for the long term wellbeing of their members, then what is the union even for?