667
Trump admits he didn’t have to tear down East Wing for ballroom, but just wanted to
(piefed.cdn.blahaj.zone)
this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2025
667 points (98.7% liked)
Not The Onion
18606 readers
1488 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Great, let's tear down a well-preserved historic building in pristine condition for no absolute reason at all!
But God help you if you want to remove a statue honoring a Confederate general
Might as well go back to the 1812 method of renovating at this point.
Probably less insulting to the concept of the USA than whatever the fuck this is.
I think the next president should tear down and start from scratch. Eho nlknows what kind of bugs that traitor has let his foreign 'pals' put wherever.
I didn't think about that. Given how lax their opsec is that is a very possibility.
The east wing was built in like 1902. It's historic but it's not super duper old and was rebuilt in the 40s to hide a bunker under it.
Was historic.
Honestly my biggest issue with this is that it seems to be a pretty clear sign (in addition to the other blatantly obvious signs like various public comments, selling Trump 2028 gear on his website, etc) that he has no intention of ever leaving the White House, term limits be damned. He's just not the type of person to do major work like that if he's expecting to move out and no longer be able to enjoy it himself in a few years.
Still is historic and well-preserved.
Aside from 80 years of constant renovation sure.
ngl I don't care about some old building but kind of want a society where thats the biggest problem
I'm with you, the issue is doing it on a whim with no plan to the people's property as he treats it like his own including his pathetic walk of fame.
Typical urban real estate mogul behavior.
old growth forest: *exists*
property developer: we got some undeveloped land here! let's pave it up, might make money having a parking lot.