this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2025
1024 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

77096 readers
3824 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

…The same Zig that ditched LLVM, to make their own compiler from scratch?

This is good. But also, this is sort of in character for Zig.

[–] TriangleSpecialist@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

IIRC, the difference here is that Zig's plan had always been to make their own compiler, but had to use LLVM to get started and, more cynically, to try and get some LLVM contributors interested in the project so they could essentially poach them.

I am pretty sure I have seen a video interview of Andrew Kelley transparently saying that ages ago but I'll try and find it to link it here.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

That’s interesting.

I dunno if that's any better. Compiler development is hard, and expensive.

I dunno what issue they have with LLVM, but it would have to be massive to justify building around it and then switching away to re-invent it.

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

LLVM is

S
..
L
..
.. ..
.. .. ..
O
..
.. ..
.. .. ..
.. .. .. ..
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
W

[–] echodot@feddit.uk -2 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

I've never even heard of Zig before today and it's right out of the gate with drama, cat fights, and public spats. Got to love the programming world.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

I think that comes from Andrew Kelley having strong opinions, sometimes with harsh language added. It's like the internet is over-correcting for the much stronger and harsher early internet days, so he's admonished for being "unprofessional". I don't care for this sanded-down squeaky-clean vision of the internet that is being pushed for, particularly by the corporate crowd.

[–] sunbeam60@feddit.uk 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

The Zig core team is pretty chill and pretty united around strong engineering ethos. And tbf their own compiler is pretty performant and produces similar level quality code. The argument that compiler dev is hard falls fairly flat when they are succeeding in developing their own compiler.

[–] biggeoff@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 hours ago

Tbh zig is as chill as an iceberg compared to rust! I really appreciate the mindset of "c with rough edges removed" that zig promotes. Already using it in our companies stm32 projects

[–] TriangleSpecialist@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

Oh I did not mean to appear combative or being a contrarian. I don't even care about Zig or LLVM to be honest. I just thought that that clarification was sort of necessary seeing as the GitHub thing is a reaction to MS bullshit, whereas the LLVM thing at least seemed to me like it wasn't (initially) from some drama or a secret or anything.

Still, this is assuming I'm not just hallucinating what I am claiming.