this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2026
629 points (95.3% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

40831 readers
4009 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

I'm just gonna say that where I live, it's a criminal offense to pour oil down the drain.

You're not just affecting your landlord. You're affecting your entire neighbourhood.

[–] Frenchgeek@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Add enough lye and it's non longer oil. Pouring soap down the drain isn't illegal, is it?

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago
[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Depends if it's an OSSF system or municipal wastewater.

If it's septic, it just fucks the landlord.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

That effects everyone downstream. If you must dispose of grease without a grease trap but you don't want to deal with like a trash bag situation: pour it into a disposable container and throw it in the trash.

[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 0 points 2 hours ago

Or just pour it on the lawn somewhere. Don't keep using the same spot.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 3 points 2 hours ago

There's no plausible deniability with oil down the drain. The landlord would just bill you for the damage.

[–] HrabiaVulpes@europe.pub 2 points 3 hours ago

I mean... people treat badly everything that is theirs only for a time. Renters and their flats, leasers and their cars, politicians and their countries, borrowers and the tools, leaseholders and the fields...

[–] protist@retrofed.com 71 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

The oil doesn't necessarily just make a problem for your landlord. Fat/oil can clog sewers way down the line, causing problems for entire neighborhoods over time and requiring costly maintenance, which increases the costs of sewer service for everyone

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

that's what my tax dollars pay for, damnit!

[–] protist@retrofed.com 1 points 1 hour ago

I can't speak for every municipality, but where I live sewer service is definitely a portion of our water bill and is (at least mostly) not tax-funded

[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago

So it will affect multiple landlords? 😈

/s

[–] kolmaskommentoija@sopuli.xyz 44 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

And even if it creates a problem for your landlord only, it is you, who is going to pay for it, anyway. They will not just eat the loss - why would they? - they will increase the rent even more, than they would otherwise, to cover the costs.

[–] kevinsky@feddit.nl 29 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (4 children)

The whole idea of willingly causing damage somewhere and somehow not being held accountable for it because it's not your property is wild.

If you have your landlord send a plumber to declog a drain clogged by a bunch of grease or wet wipes or some other garbage that shouldn't go down the drain there's no way you won't get the bill for that where I live.

There's renters protection but not against your own acts of misuse.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 14 points 8 hours ago

It also means that if the home is ever put back onto the market and purchased by a family instead of a landlord, that person will end up dealing with the issue years down the line. It's just overall kind of an edgy, poorly thought out idea.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago (9 children)

Stop treating your home like an investment. Can only end badly

[–] Ibaudia@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

If only this were true we probably wouldn't have a housing supply crisis.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I mean, individually it's just a poor investment choice. But individuals trying to live in their investment properties isn't really the problem.

The modern housing supply crisis is definitely egged on by a handful of mega-funds that can snap up houses en mass at prices which are already inflated. I'm living next to an aspiring AirBnB landlord's newest acquisition as I speak. Very unlikely she's coming out ahead after a year of renting relative to just holding NVIDIA or Tesla. She's definitely not getting any extra houses under her belt at this rate.

But I might suggest that the "supply crisis" is much more an "unemployment crisis", as the gross supply of housing isn't in shortage. It's the location of the housing, relative to the centers of new commerce.

Case in point, Elon Musk is dumping billions of dollars into Bastrop, to rapidly develop an area that's been overgrazed farmland for centuries. Then, when neighborhoods in Cincinnati and Detroit and even San Antonio have a relative glut of saleable real estate. The... ethnic composition of Bastrop has provided a level of appeal. But so has the pliability of the local government, which has historically been run by libertarian dipshits who spend all their time complaining about the neighboring Austin, TX college kids and granola crunching hippies while insisting deregulation and tax cuts are the only viable pathways to growth.

Now Musk has delivered on the growth, but he's cut out all the locals from its benefit. He's standing up his own little Network State of employee-exclusive bars, storefronts, and housing stocks, while driving long-time residents out with the sudden flood of noise and traffic.

Big investors and employers are engaged in all sorts of regulatory arbitrage and capital flight, often for very shortsighted ego-stroking gains, in order to secure an ideological end goal rather than a profitable business model. The end result is massive shiny new suburban development sometimes directly neighboring areas blighted by economic neglect. People complaining about skyrocketing housing costs who live spitting distance from some of the cheapest real estate available, entirely because of modern day redlining and private segregation.

[–] mbp@slrpnk.net 2 points 5 hours ago

My landlord must be in shambles

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 6 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

The benefit of renting is that when shit breaks, maintenance fixes it so that you don't have to muddle your way through trying to replace the oven or some shit. Also you don't have to do yard work. A good landlord is one who understand that his job is to provide housing and maintain the property, and not sit on his ass collecting passive income/hoarding wealth.

You can also up stakes and leave if something goes horribly wrong, and not repeatedly rebuild your house because of natural disasters or be stuck living next to the worst neighbor in history because you still owe $200k on the dirt you're anchored to.

[–] festus@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago

This is unfortunately only true when a landlord fixes things beyond the absolute bare minimum (massive globs of caulk on caulk everywhere is my experience).

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

A good landlord is one who understand that his job is to provide housing and maintain the property, and not sit on his ass collecting passive income/hoarding wealth.

I will go ahead and plug Georgism here.

[–] chloroken@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

There is no such thing as a good landlord. There is no benefit of renting in capitalism. It is strictly exploitative. Go away with your bourgeois drivel

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

I like our landlord.
He lets me into his pool, I offer my IT skills for their upkeep.
He keeps the rent relatively low.
Everyone is more or less happy.

So: You are wrong.

Edit: For the downvoter. Stay mad at your shitty landlord. But not everyone is a horrible landowner and human.

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

You could have the same relationship with that person, with a similar mortgage payment, while building equity.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 53 minutes ago

I could.
If I had said equity.
But life is unfair and I don't have it. And until then, I can do my share of repayment he offers me by free entry to the pool.

[–] Morph9@lemmy.zip 16 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)
[–] OriginEnergySux@lemmy.world 12 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Pissing in the sink! Classic move

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 hours ago

It's better to piss in the sink than to sink in the piss

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›