this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2026
41 points (95.6% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

1805 readers
217 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YPTB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm a union organizer. I talk about this on lemmy a lot. Today at 3pm, I got a call from my lawyer that the NLRB had dismissed my case on the grounds that I did not post protected speech. We never made that argument. Rather, we were charging that the company discriminated against me for being a union organizer.

Now that my case no longer exists, I can share receipts and a detailed timeline. You folks get to be the judge now.

On or about October 26, 2020, I started working at Activision Blizzard King as a Quality Assurance tester for Activision Publishing in Eden Prairie, MN on the night shift. My first project was Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War. Unfortunately my name is not in the credits because I started after the crediting freeze. I was immediately thrown into intense crunch working 70hr weeks, with 1 day off every 8th day. I did this for 6 weeks, before we were reduced to 60hr weeks for 5 weeks. After that, it was mostly 40hr weeks, with occasional 60hr crunch periods happening every so often.

On July 20, 2021, the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing filed a lawsuit against the company for egregious sexual harassment charges. 7 days later on July 27, a work stoppage occurred in protest of the company's response. J Allen Brack from Blizzard resigned in the aftermath.

On November 2, 2021, Jen O'Neal stepped down from cochair due to sexual discrimination. On November 16, 2021, an article was released which detailed ABK CEO Bobby Kotick's extensive complicity in sexual harassment. 2 days later on the 18th, another work stoppage occurred. We petitioned the board of directors to fire Kotick, which they refused to do.

On December 3, 2021, Raven Software laid off 30% of the QA team with no announcement. 3 days later on the 6th, the QA team began a work stoppage that lasted for 6 weeks. On or about December 15, 2021, I became the first union organizer at my office while participating in this work stoppage.

Early 2022, the Communication Workers of America began negotiations for a contract with Microsoft for a historic 2 year Card-Check Neutrality Agreement, in which the company is legally obligated to voluntarily recognize any unions that form during that time period.

On or about September 8, 2023, Microsoft completes the acquisition of Activision Blizzard. The Neutrality Agreement comes into effect.

On or about November 27, 2023, the company announced a Voluntary Severance Package for employees due to a mandatory requirement to work in the office, without exception for accommodations.

On March 8, 2024, 600 QA employees across Eden Prairie (MN), Austin (TX), and Los Angeles (CA) under Activision Publishing win voluntary recognition forming the largest tech union in North America. They become known as Activision Quality Assurance United, or AQAU-CWA.

October 25, 2024, a rally occurred at 12PM CST at the Eden Prairie office, at which workers protested the untenable accommodations process. Workers with disabilities were suffering due to the lack of flexibility for remote work. I was a lead organizer and the spokesperson for our union in a local news broadcast. The date is also significant due to the launch of Call of Duty: Black Ops 6.

On or about November 6, 2024, an unknown employee leaks the response of a trans coworker over the presidential election to right wing influencer Grummz. Grummz subsequently posts the picture on X (below). This is significant because any leak, including accidental, are grounds for immediate termination at Activision Blizzard.

On November 16, 2024 at approximately 7PM, I create a slack post advocating for responsible self defense and gun safety. Within the post, I provide options for less-lethal self defense. Both below.

60 hours later, the comment and post were removed by the company. 72 hours later, I attended an HR investigation with my union steward as a Weingarten representative. I was given an estimate that a decision would be reached by Thanksgiving. Thanksgiving arrives without a decision. I leave for vacation to participate in a union conference. When I returned to work on December 9, 2024, I receive notice of immediate termination for cause. See termination letter below.

On January 10, 2025, CWA submits a Request For Information regarding the complaints received about my post. We discover that despite claims of several complaints, there are only 8. Additionally, 6 complaints are from company management, including one of them submitted by the top manager of my office. Additionally, a related RFI for a different case revealed that my termination was an outlier for unprofessional conduct.

On a date unknown to me, CWA and Microsoft begin negotiations to restore my position. The company ultimately rejects the notion, with Chief People Officer Amy Baker issuing the following statement on February 5, 2025. On February 6, I provide my union with corrections to their statement.

In preparation for filing my Unfair Labor Practice, union stewards collected literally hundreds of screenshots involving the discussion of weapons that did not receive discipline. These screenshots don't mean much without appropriate context, which would balloon this already long post, so I'm declining to add them. They also collected character statements about me from multiple coworkers contradicting the company allegations that I was dangerous and that my post was inappropriate, which I have included.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 41 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Hm, not technically what I envisioned this comm for, but I'll allow it as I don't think a more relevant place exists right now. If we start getting more of a these I might make a new comm for it.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 13 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

I've actually been playing with the idea for a generic "how could this have been better" community for a while now. It would fill the niche of communities like AITA, but the point would be to see if someone could have done something better in a particular situation rather than figuring out who's fault something was. Not limited to past events, or personal situations, but it would have rules around keeping the discussion productive.

It's hard because I feel that a lot of people who would post in such a community, would also feel emotionally attached to a particular outcome. I'd prefer if the community could build up a wholesome culture rather than a place to vent or get into fights

[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 12 hours ago

Great idea! But oh, that's gonna be some drama to mod. Do it!

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 21 hours ago

It would require a very active moderator for this purpose. Probably more than one. I can barely keep this place in check most of the time.

[–] commiunism@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

On one hand, almost certainly the company was looking for a reason to fire you for being an union organizer. It's a common occurrence if your union was independent, after all it's in their interest to only allow unions whom the company directly or indirectly has control over.

On other other, talking about how coworkers should safely arm themselves with lethal weapons on the company slack channel was you giving execs what they wanted on a silver platter. The best thing one can do is learn lessons from this to 1. if you're going to post things like that, do it in some private chat/group that has people who need this and 2. try not to fall into mass hysterias like that and fuck up your life or efforts because of it, as hard as it might be.

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 10 points 18 hours ago

I agree with this take. Whichever way OP meant it, his post can absolutely be interpreted as a call to prepare for (lethal) violence against law enforcement. And promoting concealed carry in general suggests promoting it in the workplace as well (especially because it was on a company Slack channel). I can understand that that gets people nervous.

I doubt there were any bad intentions on OPs part, and to them a warning probably would have sufficed. But I can understand the opposite position, so I don't think the dismissal is entirely unjustified. Heavy-handed, sure.

Poking holes in certain details is nice and fun but ultimately not really all that important. For example, whether HR talked to them in 1 day or 3 is a detail, it's not critical to the case. And that they never argued their wrongful dismissal case on freedom of speech grounds is irrelevant. They likely already found that they weren't fired for organizing a union (or at least, there's no evidence that that is the reason presented here), so the next best defense is protected speech (which this also isn't).

[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Agree with this. Never ever talk about personal stuff or controversial stuff on company equipment, and have a separate "identity" for anything exciting in real life, and then a nice boring dull "identity" in personal life. No one except my very immediate family knows anything about the real me. Heck, most of my family doesn't even know where I live. Just the way I like it! I'm vague, or outright deceitful to most around me. It's awesome and keeps me out of the very trouble OP is in.

I can see how the company would raise an eyebrow with the violence conversation. I would never have said any of that to fellow workers.

That said, OP, that sucks. I have no advice for you. I've never even been fired in my life, so I can't image how much that sucks. Stay strong, and I hope you win!

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 7 points 20 hours ago

Okay, there's layers to this.

It was a weird mini essay to have on a work channel. I'm not sure why you're surprised there was an objection.

However, the reaction to that, firing you, is so out of line.

Then, there's the reasoning they give for it all being so far off from what was said.

So, on the one hand, it was the equivalent of bait. But on the other five hands, they were absolutely overboard in response. At most, it should have been a sit down meeting with a stern warning.

[–] crazycraw@crazypeople.online -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, you fucked around, then found out.

don't post shit about weapons and shit to your company's slack channels? seems like corporate life101 but whatdoiknow.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don't post about weapons when I work on Call of Duty? Ok.

[–] Chaunticleer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Calling hypocracy isn't a law defense. Why would a legal body care that the channel you made pro-2a posts in was for war video game.

Look, you are morally correct and I fully support everything you did but think about where you live real quick.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

The defense is that off topic discussion is allowed on company slack, and that discussion of firearms is commonplace even in off topic channels. I posted an off topic post in an off topic channel about a common off topic discussion. We weren't arguing that I shouldn't be disciplined, but rather that my discipline amounted to disparate treatment as retaliation for protected concerted activity

[–] Chaunticleer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah in a country with better workers rights where you aren't a Union organizer. You already had a crosshair on your head, you're lucky if they weren't bugging your cubicle to catch you saying something they could use in court.

~~This is.... Activision, no? Didn't they just get off the hook for sweeping a bunch of sexual harassment under a rug five years ago?~~ nvm I forgot they paid the fines

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Didn't they just get off the hook for sweeping a bunch of sexual harassment under a rug five years ago?

Yes, because of corruption between Kotick and Gavin Newsom. Kotick monetarily supported him in the recall election shortly before he ordered the DFEH to drop the case.

[–] Chaunticleer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Jesus. I didn't know that rat was involved. Sounds on-brand though. Anyway, point being that's like a notoriously slimey company with a probably newfound diligence for finding dirt on anyone who might bring further lawsuits.

I really am sorry about your job though. You were trying to do something I wished my whole life I was brave enough to attempt.