Is this post an attempt to disprove the title "no stupid questions"?
this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
23 points (74.5% liked)
No Stupid Questions
41634 readers
1248 users here now
No such thing. Ask away!
!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rules (interactive)
Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.
All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.
Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.
If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.
Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.
If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.
Credits
Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!
The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I have never heard of U2 being considered Grunge. If anything they were Pop.
Eh. I'd give them Alternative Rock. The thing that would likely classify them as pop is that they were so famous for a part of their career.
They have never been considered grunge by anybody. They released the album Achtung Baby in 1991, which recieved much critical acclaim, but so did a lot of other non-grunge bands. Just because a band released popular music in the early 1990s, doesn't mean they are grunge.
Haha what the fuck I never knew they were called grunge. Ayy lmao
Did you misspell garbage?
Who the fuck considers U2 to be grunge? Kenny G?
People who think Kenny G is too edgy.
Prob U2.
"Look at us kids, were cool grunge music just like that Nirvana band on the shirt you're wearing!"
"How do you do, fellow grunge bands?"
They are absolutely not and I find it sus you make this bizarre claim without providing a single example.
Link and shame them. I will fight every one of their authors in a 1v1 dual to the death
in Helldivers 2
I was listening to a satellite radio station that is supposed to be exclusively grunge. It's usually fine, except when Tom Morello is guest DJing. It was just the normal programming tho, and suddenly Mysterious Ways starts playing. I was annoyed by this.
U2 is considered grunge for the same reason Black Sabbath is considered reggae.
Because whoever made the list is an idiot?
Most likely. But which list are you talking about?
I've never heard of or seen that.
Yeah, I cannot recall ever hearing U2 referred to under a specific subgenre of rock, especially not grunge. Personally, if I had to choose, I think classifying them as generic rock is more accurate.
'pop rock' seems appropriate.
Yeah, I was tempted to write that myself, as it fits at least a few of their songs. I decided against it because I feel that I haven't listened to enough of their discography to have an informed opinion on the matter.
Fair. There are a lot of bands that usually have a completely different sound from their popular songs (which can be pretty disappointing when you like listening to albums).
- shakes fist at blur *
It isn't.
They’re not. They’re basically the one band out of the Echo & The Bunnymen, Teardrop Explodes, Flock Of Seagulls mini-genre that really broke into the mainstream.
I call it non-progressive pop, or also corporate treadmill music. Because the harmony never gets anywhere or do anything interesting, but always feel like it's moving
The only thing U2 has in common with grunge is that both were popular in roughly the same time period (give or take 5 years or so).
U2 began in the mid 1970s and grunge was a thing in the 1990s.
Early U2 was a bit like punk though.
Yeah if U2 is grunge based on time period, then Motley Crue and Michael Jackson is grunge.
Michael Jackson is disco.
Don't forget about the grunge artists Dire Straights, Phil Collins, MC Hammer and Whitney Houston...
If peeing your pants is cool, then I'm Miles Davis.
I would be more okay hearing Motley Crue on such a playlist than the other two, tbh.
I’m starting to think you don’t understand how to identify grunge music.
I'm not saying it fits, just that it would be less jarring.
Since they were the kind of hairspray rock which grunge was largely a response to, that would be much more jarring. U2 grew out of the new wave/post punk scene, which has much more in common with the origins of grunge than Motley Crue ever had.
No. They are firmly commercial rock / pop.
Whoever told you that I would consider "dumb".
Some people thought that the band was somewhat Edge-y?
Bono you didn't!
I'm Mullen over whether to take part in this punathon.
And I just don't give Adam.
If I bowed out early, would that make me a Dik?
Narrator:
It's not
Genre identifiers are mostly nonsense anyway. U2 have been many things over the years. 'Boy' is a very different album from 'Zootopia'.
I don't think they are nonsense, but they better fit the work rather than the artist. Artists shift genres all the time.
Also, how the fuck are Biffy Clyro always in metal magazines, on Kerrang TV, and at metal festivals? They’re basically the same thing as Idlewild. Is it because the singer got a tattoo?
First time I hear that, yeah that's really weird