this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2026
588 points (95.1% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

47567 readers
297 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that. Please post actually infuriating posts to !actually_infuriating@lemmy.world

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating. If your post better fits !Actually_Infuriating put it there.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, but attribution is not required in any way. No links to Reddit in post body


-If you would like to provide a source link, do so in the comments but not in the post body.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ruuster13@lemmy.zip 133 points 1 month ago (11 children)

No info about film in thread: mildy infuriating.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] HoneyMustardGas@lemmy.world 81 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Is that Jim from The Office!?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 69 points 1 month ago (4 children)
[–] AmyAye@nord.pub 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Didn't he also play CIA Agent Jack Ryan?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DisasterTransport@startrek.website 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah season 21 is crazy, they took a hard sci fi turn about 10 seasons ago and now everyone is split up. They made a whole cinematic universe and its very confusing. Jim was a CIA agent for a while and now he's a post apocalyptic survivor. IMO they're making the character do too much, bir I guess that's what happens when you run out of ideas ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 77 points 1 month ago (10 children)

I mean if you have a better way to make viewers understand what people with hearing impairments go through every day, then I'm all ears.

[–] PlaidBaron@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 59 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (7 children)

The worst is when you're watching something with subtitles (in your own language because it's hard to hear sometimes), then someone on screen speaks a different language with the subtitles hardcoded into the video.

Great, right?

Well no, because Amazon's (or Netflix etc, they all do it) subtitles have a big "[Speaks German]" up the entire time, blocking the hard coded subs entirely so you cannot see what they say without temporarily disabling subs. Like bitch, I KNOW THEY ARE SPEAKING GERMAN, MOVE THE FUCK OUT OF THE WAY SO I KNOW WHAT THEY'RE SAYING

It's so fucking stupid and infuriating. How have they not addressed this shit?

[–] Doom@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I get a special kind of mad when I watch a foreign film in its original language. Turn on that language's subtitles and the subtitles don't match what's being verbally said because apparently the subs have been translated into English then back into the original language so nothing matches and everything sucks. Or worse when they've translated some idiom for American audiences and have translated that idiom back so what's being said makes zero sense.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] JackTea@piefed.world 49 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That's not going to work for me. I can't read. Can they do a dub?

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 46 points 1 month ago

That’s called audio description, they do it for blind audiences.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago (5 children)

My Dad is incredibly dyslexic, and it's a legit issue for him.

Growing up, if a movie or TV show had subs we had to take turns reading it out loud for him. I still have to catch myself trying to do automatically it when we're watching something with other people.

[–] anguo@piefed.ca 14 points 1 month ago (6 children)

I grew up in a country where movies are rarely dubbed. I was reading the subtitles out loud for my siblings who couldn't read yet for entire movies.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website 46 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I am conflicted here. On the one hand, I agree that subtitles would have been nice. On the other hand, I think folks with hearing disabilities get shut out of other content so much that I don't think this somewhat solitary case makes it good mildly infuriating material. It's most likely just an oversight. Much less likely a clever scheme to highlight ableism.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] drcobaltjedi@programming.dev 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I mean, by US law (back when analog TV was standard) all TV broadcasts had to include closed captions on scanline 23(?) for people with hearing disabilities. it was part of the vertical blanking interval so it didn't interfere with the regularly visible broadcast. It is good to include subtitles for all dialogue, spoken in the local dialect, in a foreign dialect, and even the various sign languages. That's isn't to say that yes, I fully agree that differently abled people should be able to take part in the dialog and should have accommodations where needed.

Semi related, did you know American sign language is closer to French sign language than it is to British sign language?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 40 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That's either "sign language doesn't work with our speech-to-text algorithm and we'll be throat fucked if we hire an actual person to do a job" or some massively pretentious statement about accessibility in media.

[–] Archimedes@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago

One masquerading as the other

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rug_Pisser@piefed.zip 34 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Sometimes, and specifically on Amazon prime, if a show / movie has hard coded subs (for sign or other foreign languages) you will need to turn off the optional subtitle setting.

Of course then, when someone does speak out loud you won't get your normal subs until you turn the setting back on. I used to put in a new complaint for each show that it happened on until i canned prime altogether and went back to pirating all their content.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FluidBeef@quokk.au 33 points 1 month ago

This film would never work for second screen viewers because the characters would have to nonstop be saying “I’m being really quiet” or “we can’t make any noise, even loud breathing, or the monster will get us”.

[–] tigermountain@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago (9 children)

What pisses me off about subtitles is when they start displaying lyrics to songs playing in the background.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Although I love it when they subtitle the inaudible-but-foreshadowing news anchor in the background.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kip@piefed.zip 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

SDH subtitles (subtitles for the deaf & hard of hearing) describe all the relevant sounds in a scene including background song lyrics, there is likely to be another plain subtitle track if you don't want that

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 29 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I see this more and more with shit on streaming services where, for some fucking reason, they strip the subtitles out for the non-native language parts even tho they are supposed to be subtitled for the audience. Like for example I wanted to see the new Ghostbusters the other day since it was on HBO which I have, but half-way through I had to stop it and pirate it anyway, because all the scenes with just the bad guys talking was supposed to be subtitled but they took the god damn subs out. They didn't even translate the dialogue in closed captioning even tho the audience is supposed to know what they are saying!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago (11 children)

🫵🤏🤞🤞🤘☝️👍🤌👍🤞🤌🫱🫲🫷👉👐🫶🙌🫶🤛

[–] Snoopy@piefed.social 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

As a deaf person, why not ? :)

[–] UntitledQuitting@reddthat.com 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

so you’re against accessibility?

[–] PinkyPeaky@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago

I don't think they are against it. I think this is just a rather dark humour way to say this is my everyday normatively

[–] Snoopy@piefed.social 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Nope. That show you my daily life.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] beejboytyson@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Hey man let the deaf people have one. No need to make about yourself.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 14 points 1 month ago

Maybe you missed the point.

load more comments
view more: next ›