this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2026
115 points (95.3% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

70138 readers
535 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

We heartily recommend visiting the free port of freemediaheckyeah (aka FMHY) while you sail the high seas, for all the freshest links the ocean has to offer.

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Something I've noticed in this community is that whenever I criticize Steam, or point out something I don't like about the platform, I tend to get a ton of downvotes.

And honestly, I'm just curious why.

This is a piracy-oriented community, so I find it kinda interesting that Steam seems to have such a strong positive reputation here. I'm not saying people shouldn't like Steam, obviously everyone has their own reasons for using it. Steam is convenient, has huge sales, supports Linux, has a massive library of games, etc. I completely get why people use it.

I'm just wondering where the line is for people.

For example, do you like Steam despite the DRM because the convenience outweighs the negatives? Do you see Steam as fundamentally different from other forms of DRM? Do you consider Valve one of the "good guys" in the industry? Or do you simply see Steam as a convenient storefront and don't really think much about the DRM side of it?

Or maybe you actually agree with some of the criticism of Steam, but just think it's being exaggerated.

For me personally, I don't use Steam because I don't really like having my games tied to an account and a platform. I'd rather have the actual files, be able to back them up, move them around, mod them and know that I still have them years later. That's basically what I was getting at in that video I made about Steam as well.

But I'm not trying to start another "Steam bad!" argument here. I'm genuinely curious because sometimes the reaction seems surprisingly pro-Steam considering the nature of this community.

So what is it about Steam that you guys actually appreciate?

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] issas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

A lot of people are talking about Linux and the fact most of the people in this plataform are accostumated with Steam, but I'd also like to provide my own experience with it: It allowed people in my region to buy games with affordable prices. It used that everyone in my country had to pirate their game because not only games were so expensive they sometimes cost half of your wage for the month, but because companies had no support for our region. It was a hobby for the rich and it was almost impossible to talk to anyone outside certain circles about gaming even if you pirated. Once Steam came about with their prices and support, almost everything related to gaming was improved and prices in general went down over here, even for physical versions.

Sure, now prices are hiking up again even in Steam, but it's hard to forget how much better and accessible gaming was made in my region because of them...

[–] Iunnrais@piefed.social 8 points 3 days ago

I’m pro piracy, and anti-copyright (or at least, anti copyright as it exists today). That said, steam is a legitimate competitor to piracy AND can coexist with it.

Steam— Cons: it costs money. DRM exists. Pros: the majority of the money goes to devs, great ui, fantastic networking tools (they literally have invested in additional physical networking wires (OSI layer 1) to expand bandwidth for use in gaming on their platform), consumer oriented discovery of new titles, consumer oriented review tools, useful socialization functionality, automatic updates, easy and simple access to developer communication, easy mod support, customer support/service, and there’s probably more I haven’t thought of off the top of my head.

Piracy— Pros: free, no drm Cons: less convenient than steam, have to be scam/virus aware, needs privacy protection to be safe and to keep up with what the minimum requirements for being safe are, requires technical skill and know-how, lacks all steam’s pros.

And the nice thing is, piracy still exists, so if you need a drm free version for any reason at all, it’s still there!

Steam is kind of the last vestige of the old capitalist propaganda. Like bell labs.

They're the best case of the other side, and it feels weird attacking them, even when they fucking suck. Which they regularly do. They're the bad guys,even if they're the least bad guys.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago

Cause Steam has yet to become shit. Let’s enjoy it while we can.

[–] kbal@fedia.io 5 points 3 days ago (3 children)

This is a piracy-oriented community, so ...

So there tend to be a fair number of gamers around.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BigTuffAl@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Steam was the first time PC gaming was better served by a company than pirates. So now that capitalism is in failure state and the majority of people are better served by piracy again, there's a little resistance.

[–] Ilandar@lemmy.today 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Lemmy is disproportionately made up of Linux users and I think many of us appreciate how much simpler and easier Steam (or the work of Steam) has made gaming for us or people we know. Also, I think it's a bit of a misconception on your part that because we have some level of interest in piracy we must therefore be stoutly against anything which appears to conflict with that. I pirate because it's a way to save money and, sometimes, a better service too, but I'm not an activist or evangelical in my support for it. Piracy is never going to be the solution for everyone and having some simpler and less intimidating alternatives out there is a good thing, even if they are far from perfect and could deteriorate at some point in the future.

[–] MiRRoRMaN@ani.social 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

pirate because it’s a way to save money and, sometimes, a better service too, but I’m not an activist or evangelical in my support for it.

Yeah, I am though. lol.

[–] morto@piefed.social 4 points 3 days ago

I just agree with most of the criticism. I don't even find steam as convenient as people claim. The ui is weird and cluttered. I don't want to watch live streams, have constant updates, etc. I just want to play some game and delete if after I'm done, without even having to log in anywhere. Also, since I'm on low end hardware, I don't want additional software running in the background

[–] Chronographs@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago

I pirate everything but software, partially because there’s actually a malware risk there and partially because steam actually has a lot of value compared to the official methods to consume other types of media. I pirate video because even though I have a dv monitor and surround sound it’s nearly impossible to get the streaming services to actually give me the full quality I pay for because their drm is so broken, and there’s no way to actually select what quality stream to use or to download it.

So, I'm going to say what I saw specifically in these years. I'm arguing in a more nuanced approach to valve.

For windows compatibility, my opinion is that in the late 2010s (Wine is the overall GOAT, but I'm talking about recent history), the main driver of linux gaming was dxvk, there was gallium for directx 9 but... It was not that good. Dxvk changed the game, the moment I bought a GT 1030 and ran GTA IV on linux (like this guy did 6 years ago), I was impressed, holy shit. Vulkan is low level enough that it can be an "easy" translation layer for any graphics API.

Now we have d9vk, d7vk, vkd3d, etc, all based on that idea.

Mono did this for all .net framework programs (or CLR based programs, if I'm remembering correctly). Gecko did this to Internet Explorer, etc.

Then came Valve and integrated them all in a package called proton, then came the Steam Deck, a console on a muted Linux distro.

To me, Valve absorbed the glory that came from dxvk. They did a good thing by integrating it all and paying the devs, which is a good thing, but at the end, people forgot what doitsujin did. Now it seems that they did some shady stuff to waydroid too...

I'm not kidding, that guy (dxvk creator) deserves all the respect in the world.

And then there is the gambling, Valve took CS:GO, Dota 2 and TF2 and turned them into polymarket. That's a big no no. They improved the early lootbox and item market mechanics (in their favour) to what it is today.

They helped enshittify gaming, they absorbed the attribution (even if helping, because let's get real, they only built the bundle), but they sold a Linux console and helped pay some of the devs involved.

Edit: wording

[–] PiraHxCx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

My hypothesis is that lemmings grew up thinking it's normal having to launch a program that will connect to the internet and do all kinds of checks and telemetry recordings, even check what else I have running on my machine, just so I can launch the program I actually want to launch while this other one is consuming my battery and RAM in the background.
Fuck Steam.

[–] MiRRoRMaN@ani.social 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I can relate here, i've never had Steam or any such service ever. Same with TV, I don't watch / need TV, don't use netflix, itunes, or any of that junk. Then again I'm 52 years old, and i've always pirated everything. And so the concept of steam is literally alien to me.

[–] locuester@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Old man pirate here too. Arrrrr

While I understand your ways, Steam is nice. And you do get the files.

Give it a go! Paying small sums for convenience is nice.

[–] MiRRoRMaN@ani.social 2 points 2 days ago

I have to be honest here, I never will.

[–] PiraHxCx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Having to download, install and run their launcher just so I can download, install and run the game I want to play is a huge inconvenience for me. I'd rather pay a small sum on GOG and just actually have the game instead of leasing it.

[–] locuester@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

U don’t need their launcher to run games. You have the exe. It puts in start menu and desktop optionally.

Unless you’re curling your games onto your drive, you’re already using an application to download a game. All you’re looking at with Steam is having a game-library-aware application that’s downloading the game.

[–] PiraHxCx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

You actually need for most games unless you cracked them or they are DRMfree and got no integration, their client opens and run in the background when you launch the game.

For GOG the only application you need is a web browser, you download the games directly from the site and don't need to install or have anything else running. For me a launcher is just bloat, I can browse my library just fine on the site without having to install any program.

[–] locuester@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My point is that you installed a browser.

[–] PiraHxCx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago

And you installed a browser AND a launcher. I win :P
(don't tell me you don't have a browser on your PC)

load more comments (3 replies)

gabe sucks as much as most ceos and steam has it's problems but it also did a lot to move gaming into linux with proton

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›