this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2026
325 points (96.8% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

47257 readers
613 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that. Please post actually infuriating posts to !actually_infuriating@lemmy.world

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating. If your post better fits !Actually_Infuriating put it there.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, but attribution is not required in any way. No links to Reddit in post body


-If you would like to provide a source link, do so in the comments but not in the post body.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] superweeniehutjrs@lemmy.world 110 points 6 days ago (35 children)

Hot take - soda is priced correctly in 2026. It's a luxury and is quite bad for your health.

[–] vogi@piefed.social 72 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I just wish the reason would be a tax on sugar which is then used to subsidise more healthy options. But I don't believe that to be the case here. :(

[–] Buckshot@programming.dev 5 points 5 days ago

UK introduced a tax on high sugar drinks a few years ago. Most drinks changed their recipe to be under the threshold and taste weird now. Coca Cola was the only one that didn't. I just looked and a 24 pack of cans is £15.25 for original where diet and zero are on sale at £8.50. The tax is only about £2 on that though so no idea why it's so much more.

I pretty much entirely stopped drinking all of them though because I can't stand the taste now so I guess the tax worked. They are lowering the sugar threshold again in a couple years so I imagine more recipe changes are coming.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 10 points 6 days ago (12 children)

That’s not a bad idea. It is addictive. Tax it like alcohol and tobacco. I’ve watched a subset of diabetics scream that they need sugar no matter what healthcare tries to say about it. Tears. More often, anger and spiteful overconsumption in reaction to being told no. (A subset, not all.)

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 21 points 6 days ago (12 children)

If a diabetic has low blood sugar, then they literally DO need sugar, and fast!

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Which is true, and a good argument in favor of diabetics having easy access to sugary things -- not having them when they're needed can literally be life-threatening. It is not, however, am argument for everyone having easy access to them -- corporations bet on people getting addicted to them, and sugary drinks in particular give a sharp increase in risk for developing diabetes (according to one study, 25% increase in risk per 16oz sugary drink per day).

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

There's no question that sugar is bad for you. I just wanted to point out that the person I was replying to was VERY wrong about what diabetes is and how it works.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] raze2012@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago

You're not wrong. But by that logic water based products would be cheaper. Which it sadly isn't. Often the contrary.

The US very rarely uses price to incentivize good practices and vice versa.

[–] ulkesh@piefed.social 17 points 6 days ago

That’s definitely one take on unfettered corporate greed.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 days ago

I would agree with you If those prices weren’t being set by corporations raking in record profits.

load more comments (31 replies)
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 69 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (11 children)

Funny story, here (Denmark) it's actually cheaper than in 2017, because people have stopped buying Pepsi and Coca-Cola, so they are almost constantly on sale at prices way lower than before Trump became president for his 2nd term.
Coca Cola and Pepsi need to have lower prices now than local brands to sell!
Personally I still buy a local brand, even when it's 50% more expensive than American brands.

Because fuck USA for electing Trump.

[–] RFKJrsBrainworm@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

As an American, I wish I could buy your brand for the same reasons

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Aneorthisio@lemmy.ml 8 points 4 days ago

"And then we looked them dead in the eye and said, "Inflation is only 5% year-on-year", and they actually nodded along like we were reading them a bedtime story."

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 32 points 6 days ago (6 children)

I'm happy I never developed a soda habit.

I pretty much only buy snacks and junks for parties. A normal sized bag of chips was like $7 yesterday. The smaller tostitos were labeled like $5.50.

I'd love to see some sort of general strike or mass boycott, but there's not enough organization, and things aren't bad enough for it to happen en masse spontaneously.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

You ever notice how graphic design is done moving? 1987, 1997, 2007, and 2017 all would've had different designs for everything, at least the Walmart sign.

Change the price and you could convince me you took this picture yesterday.

Only exception might be the sprite logo.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

12.45€ for 15 cans here at this moment

[–] iocase@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I've started drinking more water which is honestly better for me. It's hard to beat pennies per liter.

[–] relativestranger@feddit.nl 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

tbf, a common price for coke and pepsi 12pks was $2 going as far back as the mid 1980s. it was due to get 'adjusted' some in that time. what is ridiculous, though, is the $8-9+ they're asking for today, when the price of store brands has only doubled (or less) in that same forty years.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] scbasteve@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

In the US, cents would be written similar to a fraction. A small number with a line under. The "100" under the line being implied. Eventually the line just fell off, and it became commonplace that cents are either after a decimal, or the smaller number.

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

I'm going to stick with the exponent interpretation because it's funnier.

[–] f4f4f4f4f4f4f4f4@sopuli.xyz 12 points 5 days ago

20 cents a can. Not bad.

The real crime is in pre-chilled drinks. A 20oz Gatorade is about $4 here now. Minimum wage is still $7.25 per hour.

[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 17 points 6 days ago (6 children)
[–] stankcheez@lemmy.world 24 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (9 children)

Regular prices for my location in the US Midwest are around $11 for a 12-pack of Coca-Cola products — that’s twelve 12oz cans. Sales are frequently run for “buy 3 (12-packs), get 3 free”.

You can get roughly the same per-can sale price by buying flats of 35 cans from warehouse clubs like Costco every day without waiting for a sale, but the warehouse clubs don’t carry every Coca-Cola product, usually just Coke, Coke Zero Sugar, Diet Coke, and Sprite.

Pepsi products cost roughly the same.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] TastehWaffleZ@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Those are 12 packs which is $8.57 right now.

[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago

That's almost 400% increase, I would not consider that mildly infuriating. Yikes.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 9 points 5 days ago

I used to sell soda at work. We'd go buy cases when it went on sale and sell it to the people.

A sale in 2000/2001 would cost you ~ $0.20 a can. Stuff not on sale would be a touch over a quarter, so we sold the soda for a quarter. Never made any money, we just didn't feel like paying $0.75 a can when the company stopped giving out free soda and put in a vending machine.

For the next few years, the sales would be closer to a quarter a can with an occasional sale being closer to 20 cents.

Costco is currently around $0.61 for Diet coke.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

mexican cola better than usa cola if you want the taste.(cane sugar vs high fructose corn syrup.)

[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Coke zero cuz I'm too fat for this shit

[–] CalypsoGirl@lemmy.today 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Or how about neither, because cola is toxic waste.

💦 Water is the nectar of life 💦

[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] CalypsoGirl@lemmy.today 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I understand addictions. Am addicted to Lemmy & YouTube.

[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Im a full time Lemmy doomscroller 🙋

[–] CalypsoGirl@lemmy.today 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Does this full-time activity pay well?

[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Couple upvotes a day... Not great

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (15 children)

This is a 2017 ad for a sale price, 20 cans, $4.99.

This is the first 20 can pack I found at today’s price. Might cost a little more than regular coke because sugar free, but it costs a shitload more than the 2017 price.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›